Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 10;18(1):233.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1331-y.

The Next Generation Scientist program: capacity-building for future scientific leaders in low- and middle-income countries

Affiliations

The Next Generation Scientist program: capacity-building for future scientific leaders in low- and middle-income countries

Goonaseelan Pillai et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Scientific and professional development opportunities for early career scientists in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) are limited and not consistent. There is a disproportionately low number of biomedical and clinical researchers in LMIC's relative to their high burden of disease, a disparity that is aggravated by emigration of up to 70% of scientists from their countries of birth for education and employment elsewhere. To help address this need, a novel University-accredited, immersive fellowship program was established by a large public-academic-private network. We sought to describe the program and summarize progress and lessons learned over its first 7-years.

Methods: Hallmarks of the program are a structured learning curriculum and bespoke research activities tailored to the needs of each fellow. Research projects expose the scientists to state-of-the-art methodologies and leading experts in their fields while also ensuring that learnings are implementable within their home infrastructure. Fellows run seminars on drug discovery and development that reinforce themes of scientific leadership and teamwork together with practical modules on addressing healthcare challenges within their local systems. Industry mentors achieve mutual learning to better understand healthcare needs in traditionally underserved settings. We evaluated the impact of the program through an online survey of participants and by assessing research output.

Results: More than 140 scientists and clinicians from 25 countries participated over the 7-year period. Evaluation revealed strong evidence of knowledge and skills transfer, and beneficial self-reported impact on fellow's research output and career trajectories. Examples of program impact included completion of post-graduate qualifications; establishment and implementation of good laboratory- and clinical- practice mechanisms; and becoming lead investigators in local programs. There was a high retention of fellows in their home countries (> 75%) and an enduring professional network among the fellows and their mentors.

Conclusions: Our experience demonstrates an example for how multi-sectoral partners can contribute to scientific and professional development of researchers in LMICs and supports the idea that capacity-building efforts should be tailored to the specific needs of beneficiaries to be maximally effective. Lessons learned may be applied to the design and conduct of other programs to strengthen science ecosystems in LMICs.

Keywords: Capability development; Capacity development; Early career researcher development; Education; Fellowship; Postgraduate research; Public health; Research and Development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This report was categorized as a “quality assurance and practice experience report”, and a specific ethics committee approval was deemed unnecessary according to Swiss national guidelines (http://swissethics.ch/doc/swissethics/manual_research_nov2015_e.pdf see pages 24–25). The report includes data from a survey of NGS fellows, for which all respondents confirmed their written consent to participate in the evaluation of the program. Respondents who are cited in Table 4 and who are identifiable via their published literature reviewed the text and provided additional written permission and specific approval for how their experience in the program has been described in this manuscript. The program that is described in this report was compliant with Swiss law and ethical, legal and financial guidelines of the University of Basel and Novartis.

Consent for publication

All respondents confirmed their written consent to participate in the evaluation of the program. Respondents who are cited in Table 4 and who are identifiable via their published literature reviewed and edited the text describing their work, and provided their written approval and specific written permission for how their experience in the program has been described in this manuscript.

Competing interests

GP, AK, MG, FM, JS, BT were employees of Novartis at the time of this study. GP is an employee of CP+ Associates GmbH, a consulting firm focused on scientific capability development in low- and middle-income countries.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Geographic distribution of Next Generation Scientist fellows. NGS fellows were based at institutions in low- and middle-income countries in Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America. Since 2011, 143 fellows from 25 countries have participated. Countries that contributed the highest number of fellows were South Africa (n = 38) in the Africa region (62%) and Brazil (n = 15) in the Americas (22%)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Total number of peer-reviewed publications before- and after- participation in the program. The column on the extreme left shows data for all survey respondents as a boxplot. The horizontal bar inside the box shows the median; the box encloses the inter-quartile range i.e. 50% of the data. The whiskers show the interval of values outside the box and values far outside are represented by points. The subsequent columns show before-after publication output for each survey respondent from 6 cohorts, with the thick red line showing the median for the cohort. Responses where before and after outputs were both zero have been excluded. The 2017 cohort did not participate in the follow-up survey

References

    1. Deckelbaum RJ, Ntambi JM, Wolgemuth DJ. Basic science research and education: a priority for training and capacity building in developing countries. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2011;25:669–676. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2011.05.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kay S. Africa's leadership in biomedical research: Shifting the center of gravity. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:314ed13. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad5529. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whitworth JA, Kokwaro G, Kinyanjui S, Snewin VA, Tanner M, Walport M, et al. Strengthening capacity for health research in Africa. Lancet. 2008;372:1590–1593. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61660-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aluttis C, Bishaw T, Frank MW. The workforce for health in a globalized context--global shortages and international migration. Glob Health Action. 2014;7:23611. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.23611. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clemens MA, Pettersson G. New data on African health professionals abroad. Hum Resour Health. 2008;6:1. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-6-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources