Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 10;18(1):763.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3575-y.

Shared decision making and experiences of patients with long-term conditions: has anything changed?

Affiliations

Shared decision making and experiences of patients with long-term conditions: has anything changed?

Reem Kayyali et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Medication problems among patients with long-term conditions (LTCs) are well documented. Measures to support LTC management include: medicine optimisation services by community pharmacists such as the Medicine Use Review (MUR) service in England, implementation of shared decision making (SDM), and the availability of rapid access clinics in primary care. This study aimed to investigate the experience of patients with LTCs about SDM including medication counselling and their awareness of community pharmacy medication review services.

Methods: A mixed research method with a purposive sampling strategy to recruit patients was used. The quantitative phase involved two surveys, each requiring a sample size of 319. The first was related to SDM experience and the second to medication counselling at discharge. Patients were recruited from medical wards at St. George's and Croydon University Hospitals.The qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews with 18 respiratory patients attending a community rapid access clinic. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis using inductive/deductive approaches was employed. Survey results were analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results: The response rate for surveys 1 and 2 survey was 79% (n = 357/450) and 68.5% (240/350) respectively. Survey 1 showed that although 70% of patients had changes made to their medications, only 40% were consulted about them and two-thirds (62.2%) wanted to be involved in SDM. In survey 2, 37.5% of patients thought that medication counselling could be improved. Most patients (88.8%) were interested in receiving the MUR service; however 83% were not aware of it. The majority (57.9%) were interested in receiving their discharge medications from community pharmacies. The interviews generated three themes; lack of patient-centered care and SDM, minimal medication counselling provided and lack of awareness about the MUR service.

Conclusion: Although patients wanted to take part in SDM, yet SDM and medication counselling are not optimally provided. Patients were interested in the MUR service; however there was lack of awareness and referral for this service. The results propose community pharmacy as a new care pathway for medication supply and counselling post discharge. This promotes a change of health policy whereby community-based services are used to enhance the performance of acute hospitals.

Keywords: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/COPD; Healthcare professionals/HCPs; Hospital discharge; Medicine optimization; Medicine use review/MUR; Patient centered care; Shared decision making/SDM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by Science, Engineering and Computing Delegated Ethics Research Committee at Kingston University London (ref: 1213/045). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Katusiime B, Corlett S, Reeve J, Krska J. Measuring medicine-related experiences from the patient perspective: a systematic review. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016;7:157. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S102198. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raynor DK, Savage I, Knapp P, Henley J. We are the experts: people with asthma talk about their medicine information needs. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;53(2):167–174. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00126-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bellingham C. How to improve medicines management at the primary/secondary care interface. 2004; 272:210-http://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/opinion/comment/how-to-improve-med.... (Accessed 15 Jul 2017).
    1. Himmel W, Kochen M, Sorns U, Hummers-Pradier E. Drug changes at the interface between primary and secondary care. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;42(2):103–109. doi: 10.5414/CPP42103. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bullock Sally, Morecroft Charles W, Mullen Rachel, Ewing Alison B. Hospital patient discharge process: an evaluation. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. 2016;24(5):278–282. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-000928. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources