Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Feb 15;25(4):1147-1155.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2244. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

Genetic and Modifiable Risk Factors Contributing to Cisplatin-induced Toxicities

Affiliations
Review

Genetic and Modifiable Risk Factors Contributing to Cisplatin-induced Toxicities

Matthew R Trendowski et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Effective administration of traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy is often limited by off-target toxicities. This clinical dilemma is epitomized by cisplatin, a platinating agent, which has potent antineoplastic activity due to its affinity for DNA and other intracellular nucleophiles. Despite its efficacy against many adult-onset and pediatric malignancies, cisplatin elicits multiple off-target toxicities that can not only severely impact a patient's quality of life but also lead to dose reductions or the selection of alternative therapies that can ultimately affect outcomes. Without an effective therapeutic measure by which to successfully mitigate many of these symptoms, there have been attempts to identify a priori those individuals who are more susceptible to developing these sequelae through studies of genetic and nongenetic risk factors. Older age is associated with cisplatin-induced ototoxicity, neurotoxicity, and nephrotoxicity. Traditional genome-wide association studies have identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms in ACYP2 and WFS1 associated with cisplatin-induced hearing loss. However, validating associations between specific genotypes and cisplatin-induced toxicities with enough stringency to warrant clinical application remains challenging. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge with regard to specific adverse sequelae following cisplatin-based therapy, with a focus on ototoxicity, neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, myelosuppression, and nausea/emesis. We discuss variables (genetic and nongenetic) contributing to these detrimental toxicities and currently available means to prevent or treat their occurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest/Disclosure Statement: No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Nongenetic risk factors that may predispose patients to developing adverse events following cisplatin-based therapy. Where relevant, risk factors are denoted as being either continuous or categorical variables based on how they were examined for association with the given toxicity.

References

    1. Travis LB, Fossa SD, Sesso HD, Frisina RD, Herrmann DN, Beard CJ, et al. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity and ototoxicity: new paradigms for translational genomics. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartmann JT, Lipp HP. Toxicity of platinum compounds. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2003;4:889–901. - PubMed
    1. Ruggiero A, Trombatore G, Triarico S, Arena R, Ferrara P, Scalzone M, et al. Platinum compounds in children with cancer: toxicity and clinical management. Anticancer Drugs. 2013;24:1007–19. - PubMed
    1. Rybak LP. Mechanisms of cisplatin ototoxicity and progress in otoprotection. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;15:364–9. - PubMed
    1. Rybak LP, Mukherjea D, Jajoo S, Ramkumar V. Cisplatin ototoxicity and protection: clinical and experimental studies. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009;219:177–86. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms