Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Feb;27(2):626-635.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5204-z. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

Femoral tunnel widening is similar between anteromedial portal and transtibial techniques following single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Femoral tunnel widening is similar between anteromedial portal and transtibial techniques following single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ho Jong Ra et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: In anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there is concern regarding the potential risk of femoral tunnel widening in the anteromedial portal (AMP) technique due to the acute graft-bending angle at the aperture and the more elliptical aperture shape of the femoral tunnel compared to the transtibial (TT) techniques. Therefore, the aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the femoral tunnel widening between the AMP and TT techniques in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction.

Methods: It should be included the studies that reported on femoral tunnel widening in patients who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction, using soft-tissue tendon graft, with AMP and/or TT techniques. Two reviewers independently recorded data from each study, including the sample size and magnitude of tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction.

Results: Twenty-one studies were finally included in this meta-analysis. The pooled changes of absolute millimeters of tunnel widening from the immediate postoperative status to the last follow-up did not differ significantly between the AMP and TT techniques at both the aperture [3.31 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-5.0. mm versus 2.9 mm, 95% CI 2.4-3.4 mm, P = n.s.] and the midportion (3.5 mm, 95% CI 0.8-6.3 mm versus 3.0 mm, 95% CI 2.2-3.9 mm, P = n.s.) of the femoral tunnel. No significant difference was observed between the two techniques in the relative percentage of femoral tunnel widening (AMP; 28.8%, 95% CI 14.8-42.9% vs. TT; 29.7%, 95% CI 15.6-43.7%, P = n.s.).

Conclusion: No significant difference in femoral tunnel widening was observed between the AMP and TT techniques, both in absolute millimeter and relative percentage, in patients who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction. This finding could alleviate the potential concerns associated with femoral tunnels being wider for the AMP than for the TT technique.

Level of evidence: III.

Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Anteromedial portal; Transtibial; Tunnel widening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7(5):290-5 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2000 Feb;10(1):2-11 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Apr 17;134(8):663-94 - PubMed
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001 Jul;9(4):206-10 - PubMed
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Mar-Apr;31(2):282-8 - PubMed

MeSH terms