Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;38(11):2111-2120.
doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4161-7. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

Patterns of the initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in incident rheumatoid arthritis: a German perspective based on nationwide ambulatory drug prescription data

Affiliations

Patterns of the initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in incident rheumatoid arthritis: a German perspective based on nationwide ambulatory drug prescription data

Annika Steffen et al. Rheumatol Int. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

This study aimed at providing a current and nearly complete picture of the patterns of the initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with newly diagnosed RA. Based on ambulatory drug prescription data and physician billing claims data covering 87% of the German population, we assembled a cohort of incident RA patients aged 15-79 years (n = 54,896) and assessed the prescription frequency of total DMARDs, conventional synthetic (csDMARDs) and biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) within the first year of disease. Using multiple logistic regression, we estimated the chance of early DMARD receipt based on age, sex, serotype and specialty of prescribing physician while controlling for region of residence. In total, 44% of incident RA patients received a DMARD prescription within the first year of disease. In multiple regression, younger patients (< 35 years) had 1.7-fold higher chances of receiving a csDMARD than patients aged ≥ 65 years [odds ratio (OR): 1.65 with 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51-1.80] and almost tenfold higher chances to receive a bDMARD [OR (95% CI) 9.5 (8.0-11.3)]. Seropositivity and a visit to a rheumatologist were positively associated with DMARD initiation [OR (95% CI) 2.8 (2.6-2.9) and 5.9 (5.6-6.2) for csDMARDs, respectively]. Based on data covering 87% of the German population, the present study revealed that less than half of incident RA patients receive DMARDs within the first year of disease and that marked differences exist according to age. The study highlights the importance of involving a rheumatologist early in the management of RA.

Keywords: Ambulatory drug prescription data; Biologicals; Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; Glucocorticoids; Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; Rheumatoid arthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

AS declares that she has no conflict of interest. JH declares that he has no conflict of interest. KK declares that she has no conflict of interest. MKA declares that he has no conflict of interest. JB declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. This study was exempted from institutional review board oversight and informed consent since only anonymized data were analysed in accordance with § 300 paragraph 2 Volume V of the Social Security Code (Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB) V).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Selection of the study population
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Prescription prevalence of medications of interest within the first 3 years of RA disease. csDMARDs conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, bDMARDs biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, GCs glucocorticoids, NSAIDs non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Multivariable-adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) for the chance of receiving csDMARDs (a), bDMARDs (b) and GCs (c) within the first year of disease according to sex and age group with women aged between 65 and < 80 as reference. Estimates of effect originate from three separate logistic regression models containing groups of age and sex and adjustment for serotype, specialty of prescribing physician and residential region. Only patients with any prescription within the first year of disease were included (N = 45,974). csDMARDs conventional synthetic DMARDs, bDMARDs biologic DMARDs, GCs glucocorticoids

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2016;388(10055):2023–2038. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gibofsky A. Overview of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Manag Care. 2012;18(13 Suppl):S295–S302. - PubMed
    1. Steffen A, Holstiege J, Goffrier B, Bätzing J (2017) Epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis in Germany—an analysis based on nationwide claims data of outpatient care. Central Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany. https://www.versorgungsatlas.de/fileadmin/ziva_docs/85/VA-85-Rheumatoide.... Accessed 20 Apr 2018
    1. Dadoun S, Zeboulon-Ktorza N, Combescure C, Elhai M, Rozenberg S, Gossec L, Fautrel B. Mortality in rheumatoid arthritis over the last fifty years: systematic review and meta-analysis. Jt Bone Spine. 2013;80(1):29–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2012.02.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Upchurch KS, Kay J. Evolution of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51(Suppl 6):28–36. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes278. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances