Evaluating Delivery of Low Tidal Volume Ventilation in Six ICUs Using Electronic Health Record Data
- PMID: 30308549
- PMCID: PMC6298798
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003469
Evaluating Delivery of Low Tidal Volume Ventilation in Six ICUs Using Electronic Health Record Data
Abstract
Objectives: Mechanical ventilation with low tidal volumes is recommended for all patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and may be beneficial to other intubated patients, yet consistent implementation remains difficult to obtain. Using detailed electronic health record data, we examined patterns of tidal volume administration, the effect on clinical outcomes, and alternate metrics for evaluating low tidal volume compliance in clinical practice.
Design: Observational cohort study.
Setting: Six ICUs in a single hospital system.
Patients: Adult patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation more than 12 hours.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Tidal volumes were analyzed across 1,905 hospitalizations. Although mean tidal volume was 6.8 mL/kg predicted body weight, 40% of patients were exposed to tidal volumes greater than 8 mL/kg predicted body weight, with 11% for more than 24 hours. At a patient level, exposure to 24 total hours of tidal volumes greater than 8 mL/kg predicted body weight was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.20-2.78), whereas mean tidal volume exposure was not (odds ratio, 0.87/1 mL/kg increase; 95% CI, 0.74-1.02). Initial tidal volume settings strongly predicted exposure to volumes greater than 8 mL/kg for 24 hours; the adjusted rate was 21.5% when initial volumes were greater than 8 mL/kg predicted body weight and 7.1% when initial volumes were less than 8 mL/kg predicted body weight. Across ICUs, correlation of mean tidal volume with alternative measures of low tidal volume delivery ranged from 0.38 to 0.66.
Conclusions: Despite low mean tidal volume in the cohort, a significant percentage of patients were exposed to a prolonged duration of high tidal volumes which was correlated with higher mortality. Detailed ventilator records in the electronic health record provide a unique window for evaluating low tidal volume delivery and targets for improvement.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest
All authors report no conflicts of interest to disclose.
The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Practice, But Verify: A Novel Method to Assess Compliance With Lung Protective Ventilation Using Electronic Health Record Data.Crit Care Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):131-133. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003490. Crit Care Med. 2019. PMID: 30557246 No abstract available.
References
-
- Fan E, Del Sorbo L, Goligher EC, et al. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline: Mechanical Ventilation in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 2017;195(9):1253–1263. - PubMed
-
- Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, et al. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The New England journal of medicine 2000;342(18):1301–1308. - PubMed
-
- Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO, Manetta JA, et al. Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. Jama 2012;308(16):1651–1659. - PubMed
-
- Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C, et al. A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. The New England journal of medicine 2013;369(5):428–437. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
