Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May;75(5):743-749.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Oct 8.

Germline Mutations in ATM and BRCA1/2 Are Associated with Grade Reclassification in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer

Affiliations

Germline Mutations in ATM and BRCA1/2 Are Associated with Grade Reclassification in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer

H Ballentine Carter et al. Eur Urol. 2019 May.

Abstract

Background: Mutations in DNA repair genes are associated with aggressive prostate cancer (PCa).

Objective: To assess whether germline mutations are associated with grade reclassification (GR) in patients undergoing active surveillance (AS).

Design, setting, and participants: Two independent cohorts of PCa patients undergoing AS; 882 and 329 patients from Johns Hopkins and North Shore, respectively.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Germline DNA was sequenced for DNA repair genes, including BRCA1/2 and ATM (three-gene panel). Pathogenicity of mutations was defined according to the American College of Medical Genetics guidelines. Association of mutation carrier status and GR was evaluated by a competing risk analysis.

Results and limitations: Of 1211, 289 patients experienced GR; 11 of 26 with mutations in a three-gene panel and 278 of 1185 noncarriers; adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=1.96 (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.004-3.84, p=0.04). Reclassification occurred in six of 11 carriers of BRCA2 mutations and 283 of 1200 noncarriers; adjusted HR=2.74 (95% CI=1.26-5.96, p=0.01). The carrier rates of pathogenic mutations in the three-gene panel, and BRCA2 alone, were significantly higher in those reclassified (3.8% and 2.1%, respectively) than in those not reclassified (1.6% and 0.5%, respectively; p=0.04 and 0.03, respectively). Carrier rates for BRCA2 were greater for those reclassified from Gleason score (GS) 3+3 at diagnosis to GS ≥4+3 (4.1% vs 0.7%, p=0.01) versus GS 3+4 (2.1% vs 0.6%; p=0.03). Results are limited by the small number of mutation carriers and an intermediate end point.

Conclusions: Mutation status of BRCA1/2 and ATM is associated with GR among men undergoing AS.

Patient summary: Men on active surveillance with inherited mutations in BRCA1/2 and ATM are more likely to harbor aggressive prostate cancer.

Keywords: ATM; Active surveillance; BRCA1; BRCA2; Germline mutations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1 -
Fig. 1 -
Cumulative incidence of upgrading on biopsies after the diagnostic biopsy in (A) carriers and noncarriers of mutations in BRCA1/2 and/or ATM; (B) carriers and noncarriers of mutations in BRCA2 only. Cumulative incidence based on competing risk analysis. Upgrading refers to any grade group (GG) or Gleason score higher than diagnostic biopsy GG irrespective of initial grade at biopsy.
Fig. 2 -
Fig. 2 -
Cumulative incidence of upgrading after diagnostic biopsy among carriers and noncarriers of mutations in BRCA1/2 and/or ATM who were initially diagnosed with grade group (GG) 1 (Gleason score 3 + 3) (A) upgrading after diagnostic biopsy to GG 2 or above (Gleason score 3 + 4 or above); (B) upgrading after diagnostic biopsy to GG 3 or above (Gleason score 4 + 3 or above). Cumulative incidence based on competing risk analysis.
Fig. 3 -
Fig. 3 -
Cumulative incidence of upgrading after diagnostic biopsy among carriers and noncarriers of mutations in BRCA2 only who were initially diagnosed with grade group (GG) 1 (Gleason score 3 + 3) (A) upgrading after diagnostic biopsy to GG 2 or above (Gleason score 3 + 4 or above); (B) upgrading after diagnostic biopsy to GG 3 or above (Gleason score 4 + 3 or above). Cumulative incidence based on competing risk analysis.

Comment in

References

    1. Sanda MG, Cadeddu JA, Kirkby E, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I. Risk stratification, shared decision making, and care options. J Urol 2018;199:683–90. - PubMed
    1. Chen RC, Rumble RB, Loblaw DA, et al. Active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer (Cancer Care Ontario Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:2182–90. - PubMed
    1. Yamamoto T, Musunuru B, Vesprini D, et al. Metastatic prostate cancer in men initially treated with active surveillance. J Urol 2016;195:1409–14. - PubMed
    1. Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al. 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1415–24. - PubMed
    1. Tosoian JJ, Mamawala M, Epstein JI, et al. Intermediate and longer-term outcomes from a prospective active-surveillance program for favorable-risk prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:3379–85. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances