Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;103(8):1066-1071.
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312385. Epub 2018 Oct 11.

Clinical effectiveness of the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme

Affiliations

Clinical effectiveness of the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme

Patrick J G Gunn et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Glaucoma referral filtering schemes have operated in the UK for many years. However, there is a paucity of data on the false-negative (FN) rate. This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme (GERS), estimating both the false-positive (FP) and FN rates.

Method: Outcome data were collected for patients newly referred through GERS and assessed in 'usual-care' clinics to determine the FP rate (referred patients subsequently discharged at their first visit). For the FN rate, glaucoma suspects deemed not requiring referral following GERS assessment were invited to attend for a 'reference standard' examination including all elements of assessment recommended by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) by a glaucoma specialist optometrist. A separate 33 cases comprising randomly selected referred and non-referred cases were reviewed independently by two glaucoma specialist consultant ophthalmologists to validate the reference standard assessment.

Results: 1404 patients were evaluated in GERS during the study period; 651 (46.3%) were referred to the Hospital Eye Service (HES) and 753 (53.6%) were discharged. The FP rate in 307 assessable patients referred to the HES was 15.5%. This study reviewed 131 (17.4%) of those patients not referred to the HES through the GERS scheme; 117 (89.3%) were confirmed as not requiring hospital follow-up; 14 (10.7%) required follow-up, including 5 (3.8%) offered treatment. Only one patient (0.8%) in this sample met the GERS referral criteria and was not referred (true FN). There were no cases of missed glaucoma or non-glaucomatous pathology identified within our sample.

Conclusion: The Manchester GERS is an effective glaucoma filtering scheme with a low FP and FN rate.

Keywords: glaucoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Manchester pathways for non-GERS (A) and GERS ((B) for patients identified as glaucoma suspects following a routine primary care eye examination. GERS, Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme; GP, general practitioner.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient flow chart for recruitment of patients. GERS, Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme.

References

    1. Sheldrick JH, Ng C, Austin DJ, et al. . An analysis of referral routes and diagnostic accuracy in cases of suspected glaucoma. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1994;1:31–9. 10.3109/09286589409071443 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bell RW, O'Brien C. Accuracy of referral to a glaucoma clinic. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1997;17:7–11. 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1997.tb00517.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bowling B, Chen SD, Salmon JF. Outcomes of referrals by community optometrists to a hospital glaucoma service. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1102–4. 10.1136/bjo.2004.064378 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Henson DB, Spencer AF, Harper R, et al. . Community refinement of glaucoma referrals. Eye 2003;17:21–6. 10.1038/sj.eye.6700261 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ratnarajan G, Newsom W, Vernon SA, et al. . The effectiveness of schemes that refine referrals between primary and secondary care—the UK experience with glaucoma referrals: the Health Innovation & Education Cluster (HIEC) Glaucoma Pathways Project. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002715 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002715 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types