Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 Feb;66(2):78-83.
doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Oct 9.

Monitoring pulse pressure variation during lung resection surgery

[Article in English, Spanish]
Affiliations
Observational Study

Monitoring pulse pressure variation during lung resection surgery

[Article in English, Spanish]
J M Nieves Alonso et al. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Background and objective: Although pulse pressure variation (PPV) is an effective dynamic parameter widely used to predict the increase in cardiac output after the administration of fluids in abdominal surgery, its use in thoracic surgery is controversial. A study was designed to describe the behaviour of PPV during lung resection surgery.

Patients and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on adult patients scheduled for lung resection surgery. Patients with bleeding greater than 200cc, or those who required vasopressors during data collection, were excluded. The PPV values were collected during different phases: in bipulmonary ventilation (T1), after the start of single lung ventilation, and the opening of the thorax (T2), at the end of the procedure prior to the restoration of the bipulmonary ventilation (T3), and after the closure of the thorax in bipulmonary ventilation (T4). The correlation coefficient of the PPV values at the different times was calculated.

Results: The study included 50 consecutive patients. The mean values and standard deviations of PPV in the different phases were: T1, 11.14% (6.67); T2 6.24% (3.21, T3 5.68% (3.19), and T4 7.84% (4.61). The repeated ANOVA measurements found significant differences between the mean values of PPV in the different phases (P<.001). The correlation between the PPV values during T1 and T2 (PPVT1 and PPVT2) was r=0.868 ([P<.001], r2=0.753), while between T3 and T4 (PPVT3 and PPVT4) the correlation was r=0.616 ([P<.001], r2=0.379) between the PPV values in T3 and T4.

Conclusions: PPV presents a predictable behaviour in the course of lung resection surgery, characterised by a decrease of almost half at the beginning of the unipulmonary ventilation and opening of the thorax. It then remains stable throughout the surgery when there are no changes in the intravascular blood volume.

Keywords: Cirugía torácica; Haemodynamic monitoring; Monitorización hemodinámica; Pulse pressure variation; Thoracic surgery; Variación de presión de pulso.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources