Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;26(12):1258-1267.
doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

Effects of Normative Adjustments to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

Affiliations

Effects of Normative Adjustments to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

Erika A Pugh et al. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate optimal cutoff scores and the effects of normative adjustments on the performance of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as a screening instrument for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD-dementia).

Methods: 499 adults 48 to 91 years-old enrolled in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and were administered the MoCA during baseline. Participants were classified as either cognitively normal (CN), MCI, or AD-dementia by clinical assessment. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed using raw MoCA scores, education-adjusted MoCA scores, and a regression-based adjustment derived from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center data (NACC). Test performance characteristics were calculated for various cutoffs after each normative correction method.

Results: Areas under the curve (AUC) were similar for raw, education-adjusted, and NACC-adjusted MoCA scores, and demonstrated minimal improvement when adjustments of increasing complexity were applied. Our results suggest that the optimal cutoff score for distinguising MCI is 24 and for distinguising AD-dementia is 22.

Conclusions: This study adds to the understanding of how normative adjustments affect the sensitivity and specificity of the MoCA. Suggested corrections based on education alone do not yield improved test characteristics, but small improvements are attained when a regression-based correction that accounts for age, sex, and education is applied. Furthermore, optimal cutoffs for distinguishing CN from MCI or CN from AD-dementia were lower than previously reported. Optimal cutoffs to detect MCI and AD-dementia may vary in different populations, and further study is needed to determine appropriate use of the MoCA as a screening tool.

Keywords: ADNI; Alzheimer's disease; MoCA; dementia; mild cognitive impairment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. ROC plots of baseline MoCA scores with various normative adjustments applied.
Areas under the curve (AUC) were similar for ROC curves constructed with uncorrected MoCA scores, education adjusted scores, and NACC adjusted scores. There was a slight improvement when adjustments of increasing complexity were applied.

References

    1. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al.: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53:695–699 - PubMed
    1. Roalf DR, Moberg PJ, Xie SX, et al.: Comparative accuracies of two common screening instruments for classification of Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy aging. Alzheimers Dement 2013; 9:529–537 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davis DH, Creavin ST, Yip JL, et al.: Montreal Cognitive Assessment for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; CD010775. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Julayanont P, Tangwongchai S, Hemrungrojn S, et al.: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic: A Screening Tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment in Illiterate and Low-Educated Elderly Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015; 63:2550–2554 - PubMed
    1. McLennan SN, Mathias JL, Brennan LC, et al.: Validity of the montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) as a screening test for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in a cardiovascular population. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2011; 24:33–38 - PubMed

Publication types