Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May;60(5):617-622.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.218792. Epub 2018 Oct 12.

A Distinct Advantage to Intraarterial Delivery of 89Zr-Bevacizumab in PET Imaging of Mice With and Without Osmotic Opening of the Blood-Brain Barrier

Affiliations

A Distinct Advantage to Intraarterial Delivery of 89Zr-Bevacizumab in PET Imaging of Mice With and Without Osmotic Opening of the Blood-Brain Barrier

Wojciech G Lesniak et al. J Nucl Med. 2019 May.

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive and common type of brain cancer. Five-year survival rates are below 12%, even with the most aggressive trimodal therapies. Poor blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability of therapeutics is a major obstacle to efficacy. Intravenous administration of bevacizumab is the standard treatment for GBM. It has been recently demonstrated that a single intraarterial infusion of bevacizumab provides superior therapeutic outcomes in patients with recurrent GBM. Further GBM treatment benefits can be achieved through opening of the BBB before intraarterial infusion of bevacizumab. However, a rationale for intraarterial delivery and BBB opening when delivering antibodies is lacking. A method facilitating quantification of intraarterial delivery of bevacizumab is needed for more effective and personalized GBM treatment. Here, we demonstrate such a method using PET imaging of radiolabeled bevacizumab. Methods: Bevacizumab was conjugated with deferoxamine and subsequently radiolabeled with 89Zr. 89Zr-bevacizumab deferoxamine (89Zr-BVDFO) was prepared with a specific radioactivity of 81.4 ± 7.4 MBq/mg (2.2 ± 0.2 μCi/mg). Brain uptake of 89Zr-BVDFO on carotid artery and tail vein infusion with an intact BBB or with BBB opening with mannitol was initially monitored by dynamic PET, followed by whole-body PET/CT at 1 and 24 h after infusion. Th ex vivo biodistribution of 89Zr-BVDFO was also determined. Results: Intraarterial administration of 89Zr-BVDFO resulted in gradual accumulation of radioactivity in the ipsilateral hemisphere, with 9.16 ± 2.13 percentage injected dose/cm3 at the end of infusion. There was negligible signal observed in the contralateral hemisphere. BBB opening with mannitol before intraarterial infusion of 89Zr-BVDFO resulted in faster and higher uptake in the ipsilateral hemisphere (23.58 ± 4.46 percentage injected dose/cm3) and negligible uptake in the contralateral hemisphere. In contrast, intravenous infusion of 89Zr-BVDFO and subsequent BBB opening did not lead to uptake of radiotracer in the brain. The ex vivo biodistribution results validated the PET/CT studies. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that intraarterial delivery of bevacizumab into the brain across an osmotically opened BBB is effective, in contrast to the intravenous route.

Keywords: brain; drug delivery; endovascular; molecular imaging; nuclear medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Radiolabeling of bevacizumab with 89Zr. (A and B) Reaction schemes demonstrating conjugation of bevacizumab with deferoxamine and its subsequent radiolabeling with 89Zr. (C) Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight spectra of bevacizumab and BVDFO, showing increase of molecular weight that indicates conjugation on average of 3 molecules of deferoxamine with each antibody. (D) Evaluation of bevacizumab and BVDFO biding to VGEF, showing that conjugation of deferoxamine with antibody did not affect its targeting properties. (E) Size-exclusion chromatograms illustrating coelution of bevacizumab (black line, based on absorbance at 280 nm) and 89Zr-BVDFO (red line, derived using flow-through radiation detector), indicating successful radiolabeling of BVDFO with 89Zr. RT = room temperature; HEPES = 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Dynamics of 89Zr-BVDFO delivery with and without BBB opening. (A–C) Representative axial, sagittal, and coronal PET/CT images showing brain uptake with IA/BBBI (A), BBBO/IA (B), and IV/BBBO (C). (D) Graph showing faster and higher ipsilateral hemisphere uptake with BBBO/IA (red) than with IA/BBBI (blue) or IV/BBBO (gray). (E) Graph showing increase in heart uptake with IA/BBBI (blue), BBBO/IA (red), and IV/BBBO (gray) (n = 4). No increase in brain uptake was observed with IV/BBBO on 45-min dynamic PET scans. NS = statistically nonsignificant. *Statistically significant difference.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Distribution of 89Zr-BVDFO in brain. Representative coronal, sagittal, and transverse PET images overlaid by mouse brain template are shown for IA/BBBI (A), BBBO/IA (B), and IV/BBBO (C). Uptake of 89Zr-BVDFO is significantly higher with BBBO/IA than with IA/BBBI or IV/BBBO and is highest in right striatum, hippocampus, and amygdala. *Statistically significant difference.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
89Zr-BVDFO delivery to, and its biodistribution in, brain with and without BBB opening. (A–C) Representative whole-body PET/CT images obtained with IA/BBBI (A), BBBO/IA (B), and IV/BBBO (C). (D) PET-based quantification of 89Zr-BVDFO uptake in ipsilateral hemisphere. (E) Ex vivo biodistribution 24 h after infusion, showing agreement with higher uptake in ipsilateral than contralateral hemisphere in BBBO/IA group and with higher brain uptake in BBBO/IA group than in IA/BBBI and IV/BBBO groups.

References

    1. Shergalis A, Bankhead A, III, Luesakul U, Muangsin N, Neamati N. Current challenges and opportunities in treating glioblastoma. Pharmacol Rev. 2018;70:412–445. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jahangiri A, Chin AT, Flanigan PM, Chen R, Bankiewicz K, Aghi MK. Convection-enhanced delivery in glioblastoma: a review of preclinical and clinical studies. J Neurosurg. 2017;126:191–200. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grossman R, Burger P, Soudry E, et al. MGMT inactivation and clinical response in newly diagnosed GBM patients treated with Gliadel. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:1938–1942. - PubMed
    1. Morshed RA, Cheng Y, Auffinger B, Wegscheid ML, Lesniak MS. The potential of polymeric micelles in the context of glioblastoma therapy. Front Pharmacol. 2013;4:157. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hersh DS, Kim AJ, Winkles JA, Eisenberg HM, Woodworth GF, Frenkel V. Emerging applications of therapeutic ultrasound in neuro-oncology: moving beyond tumor ablation. Neurosurgery. 2016;79:643–654. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources