Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 1;7(9):807-817.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.22.

Health Promotion at Local Level in Norway: The Use of Public Health Coordinators and Health Overviews to Promote Fair Distribution Among Social Groups

Affiliations

Health Promotion at Local Level in Norway: The Use of Public Health Coordinators and Health Overviews to Promote Fair Distribution Among Social Groups

Susanne Hagen et al. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

Background: Norway is internationally known today for its political and socio-economic prioritization of equity. The 2012 Public Health Act (PHA) aimed to further equity in the domain of health by addressing the social gradient in health. The PHA's main policy measures were (1) delegation to the municipal level of responsibility for identifying and targeting underserved groups and (2) the imposition on municipalities of a "Health in All Policies" (HiAP) approach where local policy-making generally is considered in light of public health impact. In addition, the act recommended municipalities employ a public health coordinator (PHC) and required a development of an overview of their citizens' health to reveal underserved social segments. This study investigates the relationship between changes in municipal use of HiAP tools (PHC and health overviews) with regard to the PHA implementation and municipal prioritization of fair distribution of social and economic resources among social groups.

Methods: Data from two surveys, conducted in 2011 and 2014, were merged with official register data. All Norwegian municipalities were included (N=428). Descriptive statistics as well as bi- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results: Thirty-eight percent of the municipalities reported they generally considered fair distribution among social groups in local policy-making, while 70% considered fair distribution in their local health promotion initiatives. Developing health overviews after the PHA's implementation was positively associated with prioritizing fair distribution in political decision-making (odds ratio [OR] = 2.54; CI: 1.12-5.76), compared to municipalities that had not developed such overviews. However, the employment of PHCs after the implementation was negatively associated with prioritizing fair distribution in local health promotion initiatives (OR = 0.22; CI: 0.05-0.90), compared to municipalities without that position.

Conclusion: Development of health overviews - as requested by the PHA - may contribute to prioritization of fair distribution among social groups with regard to the social determinants of health at the local level.

Keywords: Equity; Health Promotion; HiAP; Norway; Public Health Coordinator.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. World Health Organization. Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. - PubMed
    1. Raphael D. Tackling Health Inequalities: Lessons from International Experiences. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press; 2012.
    1. Marmot M. Fair society, Healthy lives: the Marmot Review: strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010. London: The Marmot Review; 2010.
    1. Marmot M. The health gap: The Challenge of an Unequal World. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc; 2015. - PubMed
    1. Stiglitz JE. The Great Divide: Unequal Societies and What We Can Do About Them. New York: Norton; 2015.

LinkOut - more resources