Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun;33(6):1742-1752.
doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Cardiothoracic Surgery Patients: Available Methods and Future Directions

Affiliations
Review

Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Cardiothoracic Surgery Patients: Available Methods and Future Directions

Bernd Saugel et al. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

The monitoring and optimization of cardiac output (CO) are central components of perioperative hemodynamic management in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Until recently, echocardiography and invasive indicator dilution methods have been the mainstays of CO monitoring in these patients. However, completely noninvasive methods to estimate CO have become available during recent years. In this review, the physical measurement principles, limitations, and measurement performance of the different techniques for continuous noninvasive CO estimation in the setting of cardiothoracic surgery are described. Methods to estimate CO in a completely noninvasive manner include noninvasive pulse wave analysis (using a finger cuff method or automated radial artery applanation tonometry), thoracic electrical bioimpedance and bioreactance, pulse wave transit time, and partial carbon dioxide rebreathing. All these technologies have been evaluated in cardiothoracic surgery patients, but the validation studies describing the measurement performance in comparison with invasive reference methods have shown inconsistent and, in part, contradictory results. In addition, all technologies have major limitations with regard to the applicability during routine clinical care in the operating room or the intensive care unit. Therefore, the methods for noninvasive CO estimation described in this review still require technological improvements with regard to measurement performance and clinical applicability before they can be recommended for routine perioperative hemodynamic management of cardiothoracic surgery patients outside of studies.

Keywords: bioimpedance; bioreactance; cardiac surgery; partial carbon dioxide rebreathing; pulse wave analysis; pulse wave transit time.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources