Feeding Interventions Are Associated With Improved Outcomes in Children With Laryngeal Penetration

Abstract

Objectives: To determine if children with laryngeal penetration on videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) who received feeding interventions (thickened liquids, change in liquid flow rate, and/or method of liquid delivery) had improved symptoms and decreased hospitalizations compared with those without intervention.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of children under 2 years with laryngeal penetration on VFSS at our institution in 2015 to determine initial and follow-up VFSS findings, symptom improvement at follow-up, and hospitalization risk before and after VFSS. Proportions were compared with Fisher exact test and hospitalizations with paired t tests.

Results: We evaluated 137 subjects with age 8.93 ± 0.59 months who had laryngeal penetration without aspiration on VFSS. Fifty-five percent had change in management, with 40% receiving thickening and 15% a change in flow rate. There was significant improvement in symptoms for children that had feeding intervention and this improvement was the greatest with thickening (OR 41.8, 95% CI 12.34-141.69, P < 0.001). On repeat VFSS, 26% had evidence of aspiration that was not captured on initial VFSS. Subjects had decreased total and pulmonary hospitalizations with feeding intervention and decreased pulmonary nights with thickening (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Laryngeal penetration appears to be clinically significant in children with oropharyngeal dysphagia and interventions to decrease its occurrence are associated with improved outcomes including decreased symptoms of concern and hospitalization nights. Thickening or other feeding intervention should be considered for all symptomatic children with laryngeal penetration on swallow study.

Figure 1:. Study Population.

The flow diagram shows the percentage and numbers of subjects in each group, how many subjects had each type of feeding intervention for their laryngeal penetration, and how many subjects, of those that were seen in follow-up and following their prescribed feeding intervention, that had symptom improvement in the follow-up period.