Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 1;97(1):156-171.
doi: 10.1093/jas/sky400.

Response to a selection index including environmental costs and risk preferences of producers

Affiliations

Response to a selection index including environmental costs and risk preferences of producers

Beshir M Ali et al. J Anim Sci. .

Abstract

Genetic improvement of animals plays an important role in improving the economic and environmental sustainability of livestock production systems. This paper proposes a method to incorporate mitigation of environmental impacts and risk preferences of producers into a breeding objective via economic values (EVs). The paper assesses the effects of using these alternative EVs of breeding goal traits on discounted economic response to selection and on environmental impacts at commercial farm level. The application focuses on a Brazilian pig production system. Separate dam- and sire-line breeding programs that supply parents in a 3-tier production system for producing crossbreds (fattening pigs) at commercial level were assumed. Using EVs that are derived from utility functions by incorporating risk aversion increases the cumulative discounted economic response to selection in sire-line selection (6%) while reducing response in dam-line selection (12%) compared with the use of traditional EVs. The use of EVs that include environmental costs increases the cumulative discounted social response to selection in both dam-line (5%) and sire-line (10%) selections. Emission of greenhouse gases, and excretion of nitrogen and phosphorus can be reduced more with genetic improvements of production traits than reproduction traits for the typical Brazilian farrow-to-finish pig farm. Reductions in environmental impacts do not, however, depend on the use of the different EVs (i.e., with and without taking into account environmental costs and risk). Both environmental costs and risk preferences of producers need to be considered in sire-line selection, and only environmental costs in dam-line selection to improve, at the same time, the economic and environmental sustainability of the Brazilian pig production system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ali B. M., P. B. M. Berentsen J. W. M. Bastiaansen, and Oude Lansink A.. 2018a. A stochastic bio-economic pig farm model to assess the impact of innovations on farm performance. Animal 12:819–830. doi:10.1017/S1751731117002531 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ali B. M., Y. de Mey J. W. M. Bastiaansen, and Oude Lansink A. G. J. M.. 2018b. Effects of incorporating environmental cost and risk aversion on economic values of pig breeding goal traits. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 135:194–207. doi:10.1111/jbg.12331 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beaulieu A. D., J. L. Aalhus N. H. Williams, and Patience J. F.. 2010. Impact of piglet birth weight, birth order, and litter size on subsequent growth performance, carcass quality, muscle composition, and eating quality of pork. J. Anim. Sci. 88:2767–2778. doi:10.2527/jas.2009-2222 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bell M. J., R. J. Eckard M. Haile-Mariam, and Pryce J. E.. 2013. The effect of changing cow production and fitness traits on net income and greenhouse gas emissions from Australian dairy systems. J. Dairy Sci. 96:7918–7931. doi:10.3168/jds.2012-6289 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bird P. J., and Mitchell G.. 1980. The choice of discount rate in animal breeding investment appraisal. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 48:499–505.