Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018;60(2):126-133.
doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2018.02.002.

Comparison between high-flow nasal oxygen cannula and conventional oxygen therapy after extubation in pediatric intensive care unit

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison between high-flow nasal oxygen cannula and conventional oxygen therapy after extubation in pediatric intensive care unit

Başak Akyıldız et al. Turk J Pediatr. 2018.
Free article

Abstract

Akyıldız B, Öztürk S, Ülgen-Tekerek N, Doğanay S, Görkem SB. Comparison between high-flow nasal oxygen cannula and conventional oxygen therapy after extubation in pediatric intensive care unit. Turk J Pediatr 2018; 60: 126-133. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency, safety, and outcomes of the high-flow nasal oxygen cannula (HFNC) and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) after extubation in children. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a 13 bed pediatric intensive care unit. One-hundred children who underwent extubation were eligible for the study. Patients were divided into HFNC (n=50) and COT (n=50) groups. Basal variables including heart rate (HR), noninvasive blood pressure, respiratory rate (RR), SpO < sub > 2 < /sub > , SpO < sub > 2 < /sub > /FiO < sub > 2 < /sub > (SF) ratio, and end tidal CO < sub > 2 < /sub > (EtCO < sub > 2 < /sub > ) were obtained initially and recorded at 15, 30, and 45 minutes and at 1, 6, 12 hours, 24 and 48 hours after extubation. SF ratio and SpO < sub > 2 < /sub > increased during the first hour in the HFNC group (p=0.005 and p=0.03, respectively). HR and RR decreased during follow-up in the HFNC group (p=0.001 and p=0.048, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference for PCO < sub > 2 < /sub > after extubation between the two groups. PCO < sub > 2 < /sub > (p=0.008) and EtCO2 (p=0.018) values at 24-h were different between two groups. At follow-up, HR decreased only in the HFNC group (p=0.001) and was different at 12 and 48 hours (p=0.047 and p=0.01, respectively). Initial modified radiologic atelectasis scores (m-RAS) were higher for the HFNC group and decreased steadily (p=0.001). Extubation failure rates were 4% and 22% for the HFNC and COT groups, respectively (p=0.007). In conclusion, HFNC is better than COT, especially for the restoration of the respiratory and radiologic parameters. Although more expensive, the use of HFNC may have more advantages to reduce the risk of extubation failure in critically ill children compared with COT.

Keywords: children; conventional oxygen therapy; extubation; high-flow nasal oxygen cannula.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources