Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Nov 20;169(10):665-673.
doi: 10.7326/M18-0338. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

β-Blocker Use in Pregnancy and the Risk for Congenital Malformations: An International Cohort Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

β-Blocker Use in Pregnancy and the Risk for Congenital Malformations: An International Cohort Study

Brian T Bateman et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: β-Blockers are a class of antihypertensive medications that are commonly used in pregnancy.

Objective: To estimate the risks for major congenital malformations associated with first-trimester exposure to β-blockers.

Design: Cohort study.

Setting: Health registries in the 5 Nordic countries and the U.S. Medicaid database.

Patients: Pregnant women with a diagnosis of hypertension and their offspring.

Measurements: First-trimester exposure to β-blockers was assessed. Outcomes were any major congenital malformation, cardiac malformations, cleft lip or palate, and central nervous system (CNS) malformations. Propensity score stratification was used to control for potential confounders.

Results: Of 3577 women with hypertensive pregnancies in the Nordic cohort and 14 900 in the U.S. cohort, 682 (19.1%) and 1668 (11.2%), respectively, were exposed to β-blockers in the first trimester. The pooled adjusted relative risk (RR) and risk difference per 1000 persons exposed (RD1000) associated with β-blockers were 1.07 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.30) and 3.0 (CI, -6.6 to 12.6), respectively, for any major malformation; 1.12 (CI, 0.83 to 1.51) and 2.1 (CI, -4.3 to 8.4) for any cardiac malformation; and 1.97 (CI, 0.74 to 5.25) and 1.0 (CI, -0.9 to 3.0) for cleft lip or palate. For CNS malformations, the adjusted RR was 1.37 (CI, 0.58 to 3.25) and the RD1000 was 1.0 (CI, -2.0 to 4.0) (based on U.S. cohort data only).

Limitation: Analysis was restricted to live births, exposure was based on dispensed medication, and cleft lip or palate and CNS malformations had few outcomes.

Conclusion: The results suggest that maternal use of β-blockers in the first trimester is not associated with a large increase in the risk for overall malformations or cardiac malformations, independent of measured confounders.

Primary funding source: The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Söderström König Foundation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Appendix Figure 1.
Appendix Figure 1.
Histograms Showing the Distribution of the Propensity Score (PS) in the β-Blocker Exposed and Unexposed in the First Trimester of Pregnancy
Appendix Figure 1.
Appendix Figure 1.
Histograms Showing the Distribution of the Propensity Score (PS) in the β-Blocker Exposed and Unexposed in the First Trimester of Pregnancy
Appendix Figure 2.
Appendix Figure 2.
Impact of restriction to livebirths.
Appendix Figure 2.
Appendix Figure 2.
Impact of restriction to livebirths.
Appendix Figure 2.
Appendix Figure 2.
Impact of restriction to livebirths.
Appendix Figure 2.
Appendix Figure 2.
Impact of restriction to livebirths.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Nordic and US MAX cohort selection.
ATC = Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical; LMP = last menstrual period; US MAX = U.S. Medicaid Analytic eXtract. * From 30 d before LMP through first trimester. These included wafarin, antineoplastic agents (actinomycin, busulfan, chlorambucil, colchicine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, mercaptopurine, methotrexate, vinblastine, and vincristine), lithium, isotretinoin, misoprostol, and thalidomide for the US MAX cohort and retinoids, antineoplastic agents, and immunosuppressants (ATC codes D05BB, L01, and L04) for the Nordic cohort. † From 90 d before LMP through first trimester (ATC codes C02, C03, C04, C05, C08, and C09), or (for US MAX) a Beta-blocker in the 90 d before LMP but not in the first trimester. ‡ Excluded because of missing data on parity, i.e., the checkbox for parity on the maternity record had not been filled in.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Meta-analytic pooled estimates for the Nordic and US MAX cohorts.
Risk for congenital malformations after exposure to β-blockers in the first trimester of pregnancy, adjusted RR (95% CI), and adjusted RD1000 (95% CI). Cell sizes <11 cannot be presented for the US MAX data because of restrictions on reporting small numbers. RD1000 = risk difference per 1000 persons exposed; RR = relative risk; US MAX = U.S. Medicaid Analytic eXtract.

Comment in

References

    1. Bateman BT, Bansil P, Hernandez-Diaz S, Mhyre JM, Callaghan WM, Kuklina EV. Prevalence, trends, and outcomes of chronic hypertension: a nationwide sample of delivery admissions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:134.e1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.10.878 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrade SE, Raebel MA, Brown J, Lane K, Livingston J, Boudreau D, et al. Outpatient use of cardiovascular drugs during pregnancy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;17:240–7. doi:10.1002/pds.1550 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bateman BT, Hernandez-Diaz S, Huybrechts KF, Palmsten K, Mogun H, Ecker JL, et al. Patterns of outpatient antihypertensive medication use during pregnancy in a Medicaid population. Hypertension. 2012;60:913–20. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.197095 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cea Soriano L, Bateman BT, García Rodríguez LA, Hernández-Díaz S. Prescription of antihypertensive medications during pregnancy in the UK. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014;23:1051–8. doi:10.1002/pds.3641 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lennestål R, Otterblad Olausson P, Källén B. Maternal use of antihypertensive drugs in early pregnancy and delivery outcome, notably the presence of congenital heart defects in the infants. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;65:615–25. doi:10.1007/s00228-009-0620-0 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances