Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 15;15(10):2250.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102250.

The Risk-Taking Propensity of Construction Workers-An Application of Quasi-Expert Interview

Affiliations

The Risk-Taking Propensity of Construction Workers-An Application of Quasi-Expert Interview

Banus Kam Leung Low et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

High accident rates have been a complicated and persistent problem in the Hong Kong construction industry. This situation has stimulated this investigation into factors that influence the risk-taking propensity of construction workers. However, interviewing workers who had a bad experience is problematic because changes in attitude and perception may occur as a result of such an experience. Using quasi-expert interviews can reduce this problem. The objective of this study was to identify factors that influence the risk-taking propensity of construction workers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 safety professionals all with accident inspection experience and six super-safe workers with no incident record for the past five years. Seven factors that affect the risk-taking propensity of construction workers were successfully identified. Each factor is thoughtfully discussed, and this study shows that quasi-expert interview is a pragmatic approach for deepening the understanding of risk-taking propensity among construction workers. Findings of this study will hopefully help and encourage further quantitative research on the risk-taking propensity of construction workers with different perspectives.

Keywords: construction safety; individual factor; organisational factor; quasi-expert interview; risk-taking propensity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Gunduz M., Birgonul M.T., Ozdemir M. Development of a safety performance index assessment tool by using a fuzzy structural equation model for construction sites. Autom. Constr. 2018;85:124–134. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.012. - DOI
    1. Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association Industrial Accidents in CY2016 in Japan. [(accessed on 3 October 2018)]; Available online: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/roudoukijun/anzeneisei11/rousai-hassei/xls/1....
    1. Workplace Safety and Health Institute . Workplace Safety and Health Report 2016—National Statistic. Ministry of Manpower Services Centre; Singapore: 2016.
    1. Chen D., Tian H. Behavior based safety for accidents prevention and positive study in China construction project. Procedia Eng. 2012;43:528–534. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.092. - DOI
    1. Li H., Lu M., Hsu S.C., Gray M., Huang T. Proactive behavior-based safety management for construction safety improvement. Saf. Sci. 2015;75:107–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.01.013. - DOI