Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018;11(1):1527556.
doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1527556.

Strengthening health technology assessment systems in the global south: a comparative analysis of the HTA journeys of China, India and South Africa

Kim MacQuilkan  1 , Peter Baker  2 , Laura Downey  2 , Francis Ruiz  2 , Kalipso Chalkidou  2 , Shankar Prinja  3 , Kun Zhao  4 , Thomas Wilkinson  1 , Amanda Glassman  5 , Karen Hofman  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Strengthening health technology assessment systems in the global south: a comparative analysis of the HTA journeys of China, India and South Africa

Kim MacQuilkan et al. Glob Health Action. 2018.

Abstract

Background: Resource allocation in health is universally challenging, but especially so in resource-constrained contexts in the Global South. Pursuing a strategy of evidence-based decision-making and using tools such as Health Technology Assessment (HTA), can help address issues relating to both affordability and equity when allocating resources. Three BRICS and Global South countries, China, India and South Africa have committed to strengthening HTA capacity and developing their domestic HTA systems, with the goal of getting evidence translated into policy. Through assessing and comparing the HTA journey of each country it may be possible to identify common problems and shareable insights.

Objectives: This collaborative paper aimed to share knowledge on strengthening HTA systems to enable enhanced evidence-based decision-making in the Global South by: Identifying common barriers and enablers in three BRICS countries in the Global South; and Exploring how South-South collaboration can strengthen HTA capacity and utilisation for better healthcare decision-making.

Methods: A descriptive and explorative comparative analysis was conducted comprising a Within-Case analysis to produce a narrative of the HTA journey in each country and an Across-Case analysis to explore both knowledge that could be shared and any potential knowledge gaps.

Results: Analyses revealed that China, India and South Africa share many barriers to strengthening and developing HTA systems such as: (1) Minimal HTA expertise; (2) Weak health data infrastructure; (3) Rising healthcare costs; (4) Fragmented healthcare systems; and (5) Significant growth in non-communicable diseases. Stakeholder engagement and institutionalisation of HTA were identified as two conducive factors for strengthening HTA systems.

Conclusion: China, India and South Africa have all committed to establishing robust HTA systems to inform evidence-based priority setting and have experienced similar challenges. Engagement among countries of the Global South can provide a supportive platform to share knowledge that is more applicable and pragmatic.

Keywords: Capacity building; HTA; LMICs; priority-setting; south-south collaboration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Systematic search process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Wiseman V, Mitton C, Doyle-Waters MM, et al. Using economic evidence to set healthcare priorities in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review of methodological frameworks: priority setting: systematic review. Health Econ. 2016;25:140–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bollyky TJ, Templin T, Cohen M, et al. Lower-income countries that face the most rapid shift in noncommunicable disease burden are also the least prepared. Health Aff. 2017;36:1866–1875. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glassman A, Chalkidou K, Giedion U, et al. Priority-setting institutions in health. Glob Heart. 2012;7:13–34. - PubMed
    1. Chalkidou K, Glassman A, Marten R, et al. Priority-setting for achieving universal health coverage. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94:462–467. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pitt C, Vassall A, Teerawattananon Y, et al. Foreword: health economic evaluations in low- and middle-income countries: methodological issues and challenges for priority setting: foreword: economic evaluations in LMICs. Health Econ. 2016;25:1–5. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms