Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 16;19(1):562.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2941-8.

Monitoring performance of sites within multicentre randomised trials: a systematic review of performance metrics

Kate F Walker  1 , Julie Turzanski  2 , Diane Whitham  2 , Alan Montgomery  2 , Lelia Duley  2
Affiliations

Monitoring performance of sites within multicentre randomised trials: a systematic review of performance metrics

Kate F Walker et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Large multicentre trials are complex and expensive projects. A key factor for their successful planning and delivery is how well sites meet their targets in recruiting and retaining participants, and in collecting high-quality, complete data in a timely manner. Collecting and monitoring easily accessible data relevant to performance of sites has the potential to improve trial management efficiency. The aim of this systematic review was to identify metrics that have either been proposed or used for monitoring site performance in multicentre trials.

Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, five biomedical bibliographic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, PsychINFO and SCOPUS) and Google Scholar for studies describing ways of monitoring or measuring individual site performance in multicentre randomised trials. Records identified were screened for eligibility. For included studies, data on study content were extracted independently by two reviewers, and disagreements resolved by discussion.

Results: After removing duplicate citations, we identified 3188 records. Of these, 21 were eligible for inclusion and yielded 117 performance metrics. The median number of metrics reported per paper was 8, range 1-16. Metrics broadly fell into six categories: site potential; recruitment; retention; data collection; trial conduct and trial safety.

Conclusions: This review identifies a list of metrics to monitor site performance within multicentre randomised trials. Those that would be easy to collect, and for which monitoring might trigger actions to mitigate problems at site level, merit further evaluation.

Keywords: Clinical trials; Key performance indicators; Multicentre; Operational metrics; Performance metrics; Randomised trials; Site performance; Trial management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Duley L, Antman K, Arena J, Avezum A, Blumenthal M, Bosch J, Chrolavicius S, Li T, Ounpuu S, Perez AC, et al. Specific barriers to the conduct of randomized trials. Clin Trials. 2008;5(1):40–48. doi: 10.1177/1740774507087704. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berthon-Jones N, Courtney-Vega K, Donaldson A, Haskelberg H, Emery S, Puls R. Assessing site performance in the Altair study, a multinational clinical trial. Trials. 2015;16(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0653-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coleby D, Whitham D, Duley L. Can site performance be predicted? Results of an evaluation of the performance of a site selection questionnaire in five multicentre trials. Trials. 2015;16(Suppl 2):176. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P176. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirkwood AA, Cox T, Hackshaw A. Application of methods for central statistical monitoring in clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2013;10(5):783–806. doi: 10.1177/1740774513494504. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakobaki Julie M, Rauchenberger Mary, Joffe Nicola, McCormack Sheena, Stenning Sally, Meredith Sarah. The potential for central monitoring techniques to replace on-site monitoring: findings from an international multi-centre clinical trial. Clinical Trials: Journal of the Society for Clinical Trials. 2011;9(2):257–264. doi: 10.1177/1740774511427325. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources