Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;59(1):188-194.
doi: 10.1007/s10943-018-0715-y.

Religious Values in Clinical Practice are Here to Stay

Alex Kappel Kørup  1   2 , Jens Søndergaard  3 , René dePont Christensen  3 , Connie Thurøe Nielsen  4 , Giancarlo Lucchetti  5 , Parameshwaran Ramakrishnan  6   7 , Klaus Baumann  8 , Eunmi Lee  8 , Eckhard Frick  9   10 , Arndt Büssing  11 , Nada A Alyousefi  12 , Azimatul Karimah  13 , Esther Schouten  14 , Andreas Schulze  14 , Inga Wermuth  15 , Niels Christian Hvidt  3   16
Affiliations

Religious Values in Clinical Practice are Here to Stay

Alex Kappel Kørup et al. J Relig Health. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Research to date has shown that health professionals often practice according to personal values, including values based on faith, and that these values impact medicine in multiple ways. While some influence of personal values are inevitable, awareness of values is important so as to sustain beneficial practice without conflicting with the values of the patient. Detecting when own personal values, whether based on a theistic or atheistic worldview, are at work, is a daily challenge in clinical practice. Simultaneously ethical guidelines of tone-setting medical associations like American Medical Association, the British General Medical Council and Australian Medical Association have been updated to encompass physicians' right to practice medicine in accord with deeply held beliefs. Framed by this context, we discuss the concept of value-neutrality and value-based medical practice of physicians from both a cultural and ethical perspective, and reach the conclusion that the concept of a completely value-neutral physician, free from influence of personal values and filtering out value-laden information when talking to patients, is simply an unrealistic ideal in light of existing evidence. Still we have no reason to suspect that personal values, whether religious, spiritual, atheistic or agnostic, should hinder physicians from delivering professional and patient-centered care.

Keywords: Clinical practice; Medical ethics; Physicians; Religion; Value-neutrality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Australian Medical Association Code of Ethics. (2008). Australian Medical Association, revised
    1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
    1. Clark PA, Drain M, Malone MP. Addressing patients’ emotional and spiritual needs. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety. 2003;29(12):659–670. doi: 10.1016/S1549-3741(03)29078-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Code of Medical Ethics of the American Medical Association. (2016). Chicago, United States: American Medical Association.
    1. Curlin FA, Chin MH, Sellergren SA, Roach CJ, Lantos JD. The association of physicians’ religious characteristics with their attitudes and self-reported behaviors regarding religion and spirituality in the clinical encounter. Medical Care. 2006;44(5):446–453. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000207434.12450.ef. - DOI - PubMed