Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;30(5):434-447.
doi: 10.1521/aeap.2018.30.5.434.

Paradata Analysis of an eHealth HIV Testing Intervention for Young Men Who Have Sex With Men

Affiliations

Paradata Analysis of an eHealth HIV Testing Intervention for Young Men Who Have Sex With Men

Stephen Bonett et al. AIDS Educ Prev. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Little is known about users' intervention engagement and use patterns within eHealth interventions. We describe these patterns among young men who have sex with men (YMSM) who participated in a brief eHealth intervention designed to increase HIV testing. We merged pilot trial participants' survey data (N = 86) with their paradata (e.g., system data recorded during interaction with the intervention). We created engagement (time spent on components) and use (interaction with features) metrics, and explored whether they differed by participant characteristics. Racial/ethnic minorities clicked on fewer features (mean = 8.30) than non-Hispanic White men (mean = 12.00). Use was associated with older age (r = .19), greater educational attainment (r = .25), and a greater number of methods to connect online (r = .38). Paradata can help researchers understand how users interact with eHealth interventions, and inform which components to retain or redesign. Efforts to systematically collect, analyze, and report paradata in eHealth HIV prevention and care interventions are warranted.

Keywords: HIV/AIDS; engagement; prevention; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Screenshot of the knowledge-related content section of the Get Connected! intervention

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alkhaldi G, Hamilton FL, Lau R, Webster R, Michie S, & Murray E (2016). The effectiveness of prompts to promote engagement with digital interventions: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(1), e6 10.2196/jmir.4790 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allison S, Bauermeister JA, Bull S, Lightfoot M, Mustanski B, Shegog R, & Levine D (2012). The intersection of youth, technology, and new media with sexual health: moving the research agenda forward. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51, 207–212. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.06.012 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baltierra NB, Muessig KE, Pike EC, LeGrand S, Bull SS, & Hightow-Weidman LB (2016). More than just tracking time: Complex measures of user engagement with an internet-based health promotion intervention. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 59, 299–307. 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.12.015 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauermeister JA, Golinkoff JM, Muessig KE, Horvath KJ, & Hightow-Weidman LB (2017). Addressing engagement in technology-based behavioural HIV interventions through paradata metrics. Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 12(5), 442–446. 10.1097/COH.0000000000000396 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauermeister JA, Golinkoff JM, Horvath KJ, Hightow-Weidman LB, Sullivan PS, & Stephenson R (2018). A Multilevel Tailored Web App–Based Intervention for Linking Young Men Who Have Sex With Men to Quality Care (Get Connected): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Internet Medical Research – Research Protocols, 7(8), e10444 10.2196/10444 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types