Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May;13(5):E113-E118.
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5501. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

Aquablation among novice users in Canada: A WATER II subpopulation analysis

Affiliations

Aquablation among novice users in Canada: A WATER II subpopulation analysis

Kevin C Zorn et al. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 May.

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical management options for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) associated with prostates of small to moderate volume (<80 cc) are numerous; however, for men with enlarged prostates (>80 cc), many of these options are neither safe nor effective. Recently, Aquablation (PROCEPT BioRobotics, Inc., U.S.), a precise ultrasound-guided, robotically executed prostatic ablative procedure, has become available with U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval. Herein, we present three-month safety and efficacy data from the cohort of Canadian men included in the WATER II trial.

Methods: WATER II is a prospective clinical trial of the Aquablation system for the treatment of BPH in men with prostate volumes between 80 and 150 cc. Only patients from Canada were included for this analysis. At baseline, subjects completed International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), as well as several validated questionnaires, uroflowmetry and post-void residual volume measurements, and underwent standard laboratory blood assessment. These were repeated at one and three months post-Aquablation.

Results: A total of 19 subjects who met inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled at three Canadian academic sites. Mean pre-, one-month, and three-month post-treatment IPSS scores were 21.2±5.5, 9.9±6.9 (p<0.0001), and 5.0±4.5 (p<0.0001), respectively. Mean pre-, one-month, and three-month post-treatment maximum urinary flow rates (Qmax) were 6.6±3.1 ml/s, 19.5±6.1 ml/s (p<0.0001), and 23.1±9.2 ml/s (p<0.0001), respectively. The Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or higher event rate at three months was 31.6% (six events).

Conclusions: In this short-term, three-month analysis of Canadian men, Aquablation appears to provide a strong surgical alternative in patients with LUTS/BPH due to larger prostate volumes, with impressive functional outcomes, relatively short operative time and length of hospital stay, and acceptable complication and low transfusion rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The study was funded by PROCEPT BioRobotics. Dr. Zorn has received honoraria as proctor/lecturer for Boston Scientific, and participated in the WATER II clinical trial with Aquablation supported by PROCEPT BioRobotics. Dr. So has been an advisory board member for Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas, Bayer, Ferring, Janssen, and Tersera; and has participated in clinical trials supported by Astellas, Ferring, and Janssen. Dr. Elterman has been an advisory board member for and has received grants related to speaking and research from and Allergan, Astellas, Boston Scientifc, Ferring, Medtronic, and Pfizer; and has participated in BPH-focused clinical trials supported by Astellas and Medtronic. The remaining authors report no competing personal or financial interests related to this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
One- and three-month functional outcomes following Aquablation in 19 men with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia and large prostates. (A) International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS); (B) IPSS quality of life (QoL); (C) maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax); (D) post-void residual (PVR). *Statistical significance compared to baseline. ++Statistical significance compared to one month. CI: confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wei JT, Calhoun E, Jacobsen SJ. Urologic diseases in America project: Benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2005;173:1256–61. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000155709.37840.fe. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McVary KT. BPH: Epidemiology and comorbidities. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12:S122–8. - PubMed
    1. Roehrborn CG, Siami P, Barkin J, et al. The effects of combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin on clinical outcomes in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: 4-year results from the CombAT study. Eur Urol. 2010;57:123–31. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.09.035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nickel JC, Aaron L, Barkin J, et al. Male lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia (MLUTS/BPH) Canadian Urological Association guidelines: 2018 Update. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018;12:303–12. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5616. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McVary KT, Roehrborn CG, Avins AL, et al. Update on AUA guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2011;185:1793–803. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.01.074. - DOI - PubMed