ConFIRM trial - conversion of in vitro fertilization cycles to intrauterine inseminations in patients with a poor ovarian response to stimulation: a protocol for a multicentric, prospective randomized trial
- PMID: 30333054
- PMCID: PMC6192099
- DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2936-5
ConFIRM trial - conversion of in vitro fertilization cycles to intrauterine inseminations in patients with a poor ovarian response to stimulation: a protocol for a multicentric, prospective randomized trial
Abstract
Background: To date, there is no consensus on the ideal management strategy of patients with poor ovarian response (POR) to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Currently, these patients are given the choice of: (1) canceling the cycle; (2) proceeding with COS regardless of the poor response, and performing the oocyte retrieval and transfer of embryos when available; or (3) conversion to an intrauterine insemination (IUI). When the decision to proceed with the COS cycle is taken, it is not clear whether IVF or conversion to IUI is the best choice. If live birth rates were comparable between the two strategies, conversion to IUI would be the better option for poor responders, since it is less invasive and is associated with a lower cost.
Methods: We designed a non-inferiority, multicentric, randomized controlled trial that will be conducted in 18 French Reproductive Medicine centers. We defined POR as the presence of only two or four mature follicles ≥ 14 mm on ovulation trigger day. Patients with POR will be randomized into two parallel arms: "IVF" and "conversion to IUI." Our main objective is to compare the efficiency of IVF and conversion to IUI in patients with POR to COS. The primary outcome is the live birth rate, defined as the birth of a living infant after 22 weeks' gestational age, or weighing ≥ 500 g. One of the secondary objectives is to compare the cost-efficiency of both strategies at 12 months. We will need to include 940 patients (470 in each arm), and the duration of the inclusion period is estimated to be 36 months.
Discussion: This is the first randomized controlled trial to compare the outcomes of IVF and embryo transfer to conversion to IUI in patients with POR to COS. If our study shows that conversion to IUI is non-inferior to IVF in terms of clinical efficiency and live birth rate, it would confirm IUI as a better alternative for patients, both individually (less invasive and more patient-friendly) and collectively (lower cost).
Trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03362489 . Registered on January 10th, 2018.
Keywords: Conversion to IUI; IVF; Poor ovarian response.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The Ethics Committee of Lyon South-East II (registration number: 2017-23-2) has granted ethics approval for this study. In the event of additional studies performing subanalyses based on our database, all the investigators should keep the results confidential until these are publicly available, and they cannot publish any data related to the database without the approval of the principle investigator. During the inclusion visit, the investigator will thoroughly explain the study and hand the patient an information letter, written in an easily accessible language. The patient who wishes to be enrolled will sign the consent form, and will be randomized to one of the two groups.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[In vitro fertilization versus conversion to intrauterine insemination in patients with poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Feb;46(2):118-123. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2017.11.001. Epub 2018 Jan 17. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018. PMID: 29373313 Review. French.
-
Is IVF-served two different ways-more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?Hum Reprod. 2015 Oct;30(10):2331-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev193. Epub 2015 Aug 12. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 26269539 Clinical Trial.
-
In vitro fertilization versus conversion to intrauterine insemination in Bologna-criteria poor responders: how to decide which option?Fertil Steril. 2014 Dec;102(6):1596-601. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.023. Epub 2014 Sep 23. Fertil Steril. 2014. PMID: 25256936
-
The INeS study: prevention of multiple pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial comparing IUI COH versus IVF e SET versus MNC IVF in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility.BMC Womens Health. 2009 Dec 18;9:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-35. BMC Womens Health. 2009. PMID: 20021654 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
IVF and IUI in couples with unexplained infertility (FIIX study): study protocol of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Sep 22;2020(3):hoaa037. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa037. eCollection 2020. Hum Reprod Open. 2020. PMID: 32995562 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Live Birth Rates in Women Under 38 Years Old with AMH Level < 1.2 ng/ml in the First In Vitro Fertilization + / - Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: Retrospective Study and Arguments for Care.Reprod Sci. 2023 Apr;30(4):1133-1142. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-01091-x. Epub 2022 Sep 29. Reprod Sci. 2023. PMID: 36175614
-
Effectiveness, Flexibility and Safety of Switching IVF to IVM as a Rescue Strategy in Unexpected Poor Ovarian Response for PCOS Infertility Patients.J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 2;12(5):1978. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051978. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36902766 Free PMC article.
-
Live birth rates in in vitro fertilization cycles with five or fewer follicles.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Jan;41(1):223-229. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02985-8. Epub 2023 Nov 18. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 37978117 Free PMC article.
-
Observational retrospective study of UK national success, risks and costs for 319,105 IVF/ICSI and 30,669 IUI treatment cycles.BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 16;10(3):e034566. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034566. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32184314 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Reichman DE, Gunnala V, Meyer L, et al. In vitro fertilization versus conversion to intrauterine insemination in the setting of three or fewer follicles: how should patients proceed when follicular response falls short of expectation? Fertil Steril. 2013;100(1):94–99. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.049. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical