Skin Cancer Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks: Systematic Review
- PMID: 30333097
- PMCID: PMC6231861
- DOI: 10.2196/11936
Skin Cancer Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks: Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: State-of-the-art classifiers based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were shown to classify images of skin cancer on par with dermatologists and could enable lifesaving and fast diagnoses, even outside the hospital via installation of apps on mobile devices. To our knowledge, at present there is no review of the current work in this research area.
Objective: This study presents the first systematic review of the state-of-the-art research on classifying skin lesions with CNNs. We limit our review to skin lesion classifiers. In particular, methods that apply a CNN only for segmentation or for the classification of dermoscopic patterns are not considered here. Furthermore, this study discusses why the comparability of the presented procedures is very difficult and which challenges must be addressed in the future.
Methods: We searched the Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases for systematic reviews and original research articles published in English. Only papers that reported sufficient scientific proceedings are included in this review.
Results: We found 13 papers that classified skin lesions using CNNs. In principle, classification methods can be differentiated according to three principles. Approaches that use a CNN already trained by means of another large dataset and then optimize its parameters to the classification of skin lesions are the most common ones used and they display the best performance with the currently available limited datasets.
Conclusions: CNNs display a high performance as state-of-the-art skin lesion classifiers. Unfortunately, it is difficult to compare different classification methods because some approaches use nonpublic datasets for training and/or testing, thereby making reproducibility difficult. Future publications should use publicly available benchmarks and fully disclose methods used for training to allow comparability.
Keywords: carcinoma classification; convolutional neural networks; deep learning; lesion classification; melanoma classification; skin cancer.
©Titus Josef Brinker, Achim Hekler, Jochen Sven Utikal, Niels Grabe, Dirk Schadendorf, Joachim Klode, Carola Berking, Theresa Steeb, Alexander H Enk, Christof von Kalle. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 17.10.2018.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Nami N, Giannini E, Burroni M, Fimiani M, Rubegni P. Teledermatology: State-of-the-art and future perspectives. Expert Rev Dermatol. 2014 Jan 10;7(1):1–3. doi: 10.1586/edm.11.79. - DOI
-
- Fabbrocini G, Triassi M, Mauriello MC, Torre G, Annunziata MC, De Vita V, Pastore F, D'Arco V, Monfrecola G. Epidemiology of skin cancer: Role of some environmental factors. Cancers (Basel) 2010 Nov 24;2(4):1980–1989. doi: 10.3390/cancers2041980. http://www.mdpi.com/resolver?pii=cancers2041980 cancers2041980 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Haenssle H, Fink C, Schneiderbauer R, Toberer F, Buhl T, Blum A, Kalloo A, Hassen ABH, Thomas L, Enk A, Uhlmann L, Reader Study Level-I and Level-II Groups Man against machine: Diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists. Ann Oncol. 2018 Aug 01;29(8):1836–1842. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy166.5004443 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Argenziano G, Soyer HP. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: A valuable tool for early diagnosis of melanoma. Lancet Oncol. 2001 Jul;2(7):443–449. - PubMed
-
- Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol. 2002 Mar;3(3):159–165.S1470204502006794 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
