Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 8;89(3):343-348.
doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i3.7050.

Thomas Percival. Discussing the foundation of Medical Ethics

Affiliations

Thomas Percival. Discussing the foundation of Medical Ethics

Sara Patuzzo et al. Acta Biomed. .

Abstract

Background and aim of the work: In 1803, the English physician Thomas Percival published Medical Ethics, a work destined to become a milestone in the development of modern codes of medical ethics, starting from the first edition of the American Medical Association's ethical code. Notwithstanding the undeniable influence that this book has exerted upon the codification of the principles of medical ethics, researchers and experts foster different and opposing points of views on its real nature. They question whether Medical Ethics truly belongs to the literary genre of codes of medical ethics or, better yet, to that of medical etiquettes.

Methods: This debate is crucial in the field both of medical history and of medical ethics, with regard not only to Percival's work, but also to the ethical value of the current codes of medical ethics and deontology.

Results: The lack of a rigorous philosophical-moral analysis of the current medical codification is reflected in its mere loyalty to the legal regulation, in substantial continuity with the past. However, the constant challenges proposed by the biomedical development, require the need to rethink the traditional conceptual tools of the current codes of medical ethics, with the purpose to achieve new schemes and innovative solutions.

Conclusions: On this perspective, when the codes of medical ethics are worked out by physicians, they could be considered as wrongly titled medical etiquettes. This consideration could regard current codes of medical ethics, that remain faithful to tradition and that would more probably be codes of medical etiquette with a wrong title.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Percival T. Strand, London, Manchester: S. Russell for J. Johnson, St. Paul’s Church Yard and R. Bickerstaff; 1803. Medical Ethics; or, a Code of Institutes and Precepts, Adapted to the Professional Conduct of Physicians and Surgeons; In Hospital Practice. In private, or general Practice. III. In relation to Apothecaries. In Cases which may require a knowledge of Law. To which is added an Appendix; containing a discourse on Hospital duties; also notes and illustrations.
    1. Baker R. Deciphering Percival’s Code. In: Baker R, Porter D, Porter R, editors. The codification of medical morality. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 1993. pp. 179–211.
    1. Belkin GS. History and Bioethics: The Uses of Thomas Percival. Medical Humanities Review. 1998;12:39–59. - PubMed
    1. Percival T. Medical Ethics. Italian translation by Goracci Giada. 11-30. In: Patuzzo Sara., editor. Milano: Mimesis; 2015.
    1. Carr-Saunders AM, Wilson PA. London: Oxford University Press; 1933. The professions.

Personal name as subject