Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct 2:5:90.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2018.00090. eCollection 2018.

How Can We Define "Optimal Microbiota?": A Comparative Review of Structure and Functions of Microbiota of Animals, Fish, and Plants in Agriculture

Affiliations
Review

How Can We Define "Optimal Microbiota?": A Comparative Review of Structure and Functions of Microbiota of Animals, Fish, and Plants in Agriculture

Wakako Ikeda-Ohtsubo et al. Front Nutr. .

Erratum in

Abstract

All multicellular organisms benefit from their own microbiota, which play important roles in maintaining the host nutritional health and immunity. Recently, the number of studies on the microbiota of animals, fish, and plants of economic importance is rapidly expanding and there are increasing expectations that productivity and sustainability in agricultural management can be improved by microbiota manipulation. However, optimizing microbiota is still a challenging task because of the lack of knowledge on the dominant microorganisms or significant variations between microbiota, reflecting sampling biases, different agricultural management as well as breeding backgrounds. To offer a more generalized view on microbiota in agriculture, which can be used for defining criteria of "optimal microbiota" as the goal of manipulation, we summarize here current knowledge on microbiota on animals, fish, and plants with emphasis on bacterial community structure and metabolic functions, and how microbiota can be affected by domestication, conventional agricultural practices, and use of antimicrobial agents. Finally, we discuss future tasks for defining "optimal microbiota," which can improve host growth, nutrition, and immunity and reduce the use of antimicrobial agents in agriculture.

Keywords: agricultural immunology; agriculture; animal husbandry; aquaculture; microbiota; phyllosphere; rhizosphere.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Microbiota in agriculture. The figure provides an overview of the bacterial composition of the microbiota of different parts of livestock animals, gill and intestines of fish, and phyllosphere and rhizosphere of plants at the phylum-level (pie-charts) and lower taxonomic levels. The data sources are 16S rRNA or metagenomic analyses of intestinal samples from pigs (14, 15), cattle (3, 16), chicken (17), Atlantic salmon (18), grass carp (19), gill and mucosal samples from rainbow trout (20), leaf samples from lettuce (21), leaf and rhizosphere samples from soybean (22, 23), root and rhizosphere samples from maize (24), rice (25, 26).

References

    1. Hacquard S, Garrido-Oter R, González A, Spaepen S, Ackermann G, Lebeis S, et al. . Microbiota and host nutrition across plant and animal kingdoms. Cell Host Microbe (2015) 17:603–16. 10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mueller UG, Sachs JL. Engineering microbiomes to improve plant and animal health. Trends Microbiol. (2015) 23:606–17. 10.1016/j.tim.2015.07.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mao S, Zhang M, Liu J, Zhu W. Characterising the bacterial microbiota across the gastrointestinal tracts of dairy cattle: membership and potential function. Sci Rep. (2015) 5:16116. 10.1038/srep16116 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thibodeau A, Letellier A, Yergeau É, Larrivière-Gauthier G, Fravalo P. Lack of evidence that selenium-yeast improves chicken health and modulates the caecal microbiota in the context of colonization by Campylobacter jejuni. Front Microbiol. (2017) 8:451. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00451 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wemheuer F, Kaiser K, Karlovsky P, Daniel R, Vidal S, Wemheuer B. Bacterial endophyte communities of three agricultural important grass species differ in their response towards management regimes. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:40914. 10.1038/srep40914 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types