Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Nov;58(10):1541-1555.
doi: 10.1111/head.13422. Epub 2018 Oct 18.

Anxiety, Incentives, and Adherence to Self-Monitoring on a Mobile Health Platform: A Naturalistic Longitudinal Cohort Study in People With Headache

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Anxiety, Incentives, and Adherence to Self-Monitoring on a Mobile Health Platform: A Naturalistic Longitudinal Cohort Study in People With Headache

Elizabeth K Seng et al. Headache. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate factors associated naturalistically with adherence to a mobile headache diary.

Background: Self-monitoring (keeping a headache diary) is commonly used in headache to enhance diagnostic accuracy and evaluate the effectiveness of headache therapies. Mobile applications are increasingly used to facilitate keeping a headache diary. Little is known about the factors associated with adherence to mobile headache diaries.

Methods: In this naturalistic longitudinal cohort study, people with headache (n = 1561) registered to use Curelator Headache® (now called N1-Headache®), an application that includes a mobile headache diary, through their physician (coupon), or directly through the website or app store using either a paid or free version of the application. Participants completed baseline questionnaires and were asked to complete daily recordings of headache symptoms and other factors for at least 90 days. Baseline questionnaires included headache characteristics and migraine disability. Daily recordings included headache symptoms and anxiety ratings. Adherence to keeping the headache diary was conceptualized as completion (kept the headache diary for 90 days), adherence rate (proportion of diary days completed 90 days after registration), and completion delay (the number of days past 90 days after registration required to complete 90 days of headache diary).

Results: The majority of participants reported migraine as the most common headache type (90.0%), and reported an average of 30.8 headache days/90 days (SD = 24.2). One-third of participants completed 90 days of headache diary (32.4%). Endorsing higher daily anxiety scores (8/10 OR = 0.97 [95% CI = 0.96, 0.99]; 10/10 OR = 0.96 [95% CI = 0.91, 0.99]) was associated with lower odds of completion, whereas higher age (OR = 1.04 [95% CI = 1.03, 1.05]), and downloading the app paid vs free (OR = 4.27 [95% CI = 2.62, 7.06]), paid vs coupon (OR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.41, 4.26]), or through a physician coupon vs free (OR = 1.75 [95% CI = 1.27, 2.42]) were associated with higher odds of completion. The median adherence rate at 90 days was 0.34 (IQR = 0.10-0.88), indicating that half of participants kept 34 or fewer days 90 diary days after registration. Endorsing high daily anxiety scores (5/10 OR = 0.98 [95% CI = 0.97, 1.00]; 8/10 OR = 0.96 [95% CI = 0.94, 0.98]; 10/10 OR = 0.96 [9% CI = 0.92, 0.98]) and higher age (OR = 1.05 [95% CI = 1.04, 1.07]) were associated with lower odds of adhering at 90 days, whereas downloading the app paid vs free (OR = 9.63 [95% CI = 4.61, 25.51]), paid vs coupon (OR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.27, 5.10]), or through a physician coupon vs free (OR = 4.01 [95% CI = 2.54, 7.26]) were associated with higher odds of adhering at 90 days. Among completers, the median completion delay was 6.0 days (IQR = 2.0-15.0). Among completers, endorsing high daily anxiety scores (9/10 OR = 1/06 [95% CI = 1.01, 1.12]) and younger age (OR = 0.98 [95% CI = 0.97, 1.00]) was associated with completion delay; downloading the app through physician coupon vs free (OR = 0.40 [95% CI = 0.22, 0.71]) or paid vs free (OR = 0.38 [95% CI = 0.20, 0.72]) was associated with lower odds of completing 90 diary days in 90 calendar days.

Conclusion: This naturalistic observational study confirmed evidence from clinical observation and research: adherence to mobile headache diaries is a challenge for a significant proportion of people with headache. Endorsing higher levels of daily anxiety, younger age, and downloading the app for free (vs either paying for the self-monitoring app or receiving a physician referral coupon) were associated with poorer adherence to keeping a mobile headache diary.

Keywords: adherence; anxiety; eHealth; headache; mHealth; self-monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement: Elizabeth K. Seng, Ph.D. has received funding from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23 NS096107 PI:Seng) and served as a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline and Eli Lilly. Pablo Prieto, Gabriel Boucher and Marina Vives-Mestres, Ph.D., are employees of Curelator™.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
User flow of Curelator Headache®. Users download the app with 3 different types of accounts (free, coupon, and paid). Users then register and complete the 1-time onboarding questionnaire. Users then enter daily data headache symptoms and potential trigger factors. After 90 days, paid and coupon users get personalized maps of risk factors.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Participant flow diagram.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Summary of the 11 most frequent patterns of anxiety scores. This figure represents 29.0% of users. Barplots on the margins display percentage of unobserved values by component (top) and percentage occurrence of the patterns in the data set (right).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fox S, Duggan M. Tracking for health Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2013. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/28/tracking-for-health/.
    1. Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Darbinian JA, D’Agostino RB Jr, , Ferrara A, Liu J, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycemic control: the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes registry. Am J Med. 2001;111(1):1–9. - PubMed
    1. Burke LE, Wang J, Sevick MA. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(1):92–102. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vanwormer JJ, French SA, Pereira MA, Welsh EM. The impact of regular self-weighing on weight management: a systematic literature review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malanda UL, Welschen LM, Riphagen II, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Bot SD. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;1:Cd005060. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms