Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;21(18):3469-3476.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980018002744. Epub 2018 Oct 18.

Voluntary industry initiatives to promote healthy diets: a case study on a major European food retailer

Affiliations

Voluntary industry initiatives to promote healthy diets: a case study on a major European food retailer

Peter von Philipsborn et al. Public Health Nutr. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To analyse the scope and content of the nutrition pledge announced by Lidl.

Design: We applied the approach recommended by the private-sector module of the INFORMAS (International Network for Food and Obesity Research, Monitoring and Action Support) food environment monitoring framework and qualitative content analysis to Lidl's nutrition pledge.

Setting: Global.

Subjects: The nutrition pledge of Lidl, Europe's largest food retailer.

Results: Lidl pledges to reduce the average sales-weighted content of added sugar and added salt in its own-brand products by 20 % until 2025, using 2015 as a baseline, starting in Germany. Moreover, it vows to reduce the saturated and trans-fatty acid contents of its own-brand products, without specifying targets or timelines. To achieve these targets, it pledges to apply a number of approaches, including reformulation, promotion of healthier products, reduction of package and portion sizes, and provision of nutrition information and education. Strengths of Lidl's pledge are its extensive scope, the quantification of some targets, and its partially evidence-based approach to the selection of targets and interventions. Key limitations include the vagueness of many targets, a lack of transparency and the absence of independent monitoring and evaluation.

Conclusions: Lidl's pledge, while commendable for its scope, does not meet current best practice guidelines. Given their current limitations, industry initiatives of this kind are likely to fall short of what is needed to improve population-level nutrition.

Keywords: Food environments; Food retailing; Germany; INFORMAS; Industry self-regulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dutch EU Presidency (2016) Roadmap for Action on Food Product Improvement. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/formulieren/2016/02/22/roadmap-f... (accessed April 2017).
    1. Dutch Ministry of Health Welfare and Sport (2016) Agreement to Improve Product Composition 2014–2020. http://www.rivm.nl/en/Topics/F/Food_Reformulation/Dutch_Agreement_to_Imp... (accessed April 2017).
    1. Koplan JP & Brownell KD (2010) Response of the food and beverage industry to the obesity threat. JAMA 304, 1487–1488. - PubMed
    1. Scott C, Hawkins B & Knai C (2017) Food and beverage product reformulation as a corporate political strategy. Soc Sci Med 172, 37–45. - PubMed
    1. Kraak VI & Story M (2015) Guiding principles and a decision-making framework for stakeholders pursuing healthy food environments. Health Aff (Millwood) 34, 1972–1978. - PubMed