Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Oct/Dec;45(4):364-376.
doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000226.

The patient-centered oncology care on health care utilization and cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The patient-centered oncology care on health care utilization and cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Hailun Liang et al. Health Care Manage Rev. 2020 Oct/Dec.

Abstract

Background: Optimal cancer care entails coordination among multiple providers and continued follow-up and surveillance over time. The patient-centered care brings opportunities to improve the delivery of cancer care. The adoption of patient-centered oncology care (PCOC) is in its infancy. Evidence synthesis on the model's effectiveness is scant.

Purposes: This is the first systemic review and meta-analysis on associations of PCOC with cancer patients' adverse health care utilization, cost, patient satisfaction, and quality of care.

Methods: Our study was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) framework. Quality appraisal was performed using Downs and Black's quality checklist. Study-level effect sizes of adverse health care utilization were computed using Cohen's d and summarized using forest plots. Funnel plots were constructed to examine publication bias.

Results: Of 334 studies that were reviewed, 10 met eligibility criteria and were included into the final analysis. Many included studies implemented almost all six of patient-centered care core attributes, plus three additional attributes that specifically addressed cancer patients' needs, including triage pathways, standardized and evidence-based symptom management, as well as support patient navigation. PCOC patients had lower utilization of inpatient care (standardized means difference [SMD] = -0.027, p = .049). Overall positive effect of PCOC on emergency department use was small and not significant (SMD = -0.023, p = .103). With regard to cost and quality of care, our narrative summaries showed an overall positive direction, though we found limitations in individual study quality that precluded a meta-analysis.

Public implication: The results showed that it is possible to utilize patient-centered model to support best practice of cancer care. Early evidence shows that the PCOC model has potential to improve health care utilization, cost, and quality of care, but limited numbers of included articles and heterogeneity of those studies implied that more rigorous research is expected to further investigate the model's effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Conceptual Framework for Patient-Centered Oncology Care
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Screening Process for the Eligible Studies

References

    1. Ahmed S, Shahid RK, & Gesy K (2015). Cancer care burden: aiming at the Achilles heel. Current Oncology, 22(3), e134–138. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2252 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society. (2017). Cancer Facts & Figures 2017. Atlanta: American Cancer Society.
    1. American Cancer Society. (2013). Economic impact of cancer. Retrieved from www.cancer.org/cancer/cancerbasics/economic-impact-of-cancer.
    1. American Society of Clinical Oncology. (2014). Potential approaches to sustainable, long-lasting payment reform in oncology. Journal of Oncology Practice, 10(4), 254–258. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001267 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arend J, Tsang-Quinn J, Levine C, & Thomas D (2012). The patient-centered medical home: history, components, and review of the evidence. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 79(4), 433–450. doi: 10.1002/msj.21326 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms