Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 1;144(9):802-806.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.1447.

Evaluation of Social Media Presence of Otolaryngology Residency Programs in the United States

Affiliations

Evaluation of Social Media Presence of Otolaryngology Residency Programs in the United States

Deborah X Xie et al. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Over two-thirds of the adult population in the United States use Facebook. Despite the high interest in and use of social media by the general public, the presence and accessibility of health care organizations on social media has not yet been fully evaluated.

Objective: To determine the use and popularity of social media among otolaryngology residency programs in the United States.

Design, setting, and participants: A cross-sectional study of the presence of accredited otolaryngology residency programs in the United States in an internet data repository was conducted. Programs were stratified by Doximity Residency Navigator reputation rankings (dividing programs into quartiles) and US News & World Report (comparing programs affiliated with hospitals ranked in the top 50 vs programs affiliated with unranked hospitals). Social media sites and activity for each program were assessed using internet searches. The study was conducted in April 2017.

Results: Among 101 otolaryngology residency programs, 30 were found to have social media sites (29.7%). Facebook and Twitter were the most commonly used services, with 25 (24.8%) and 14 (13.9%) accounts, respectively. Based on Doximity Residency Navigator rankings, programs in the first quartile were more likely to have Facebook profiles than programs in the fourth quartile (42.3% vs 12.0%; absolute difference, 30%; 95% CI, 2.9% to 52.6%). First- and second-quartile programs showed increased Facebook activity. There was greater Twitter presence in first- vs fourth-quartile programs (19.2% vs 8.0%; absolute difference, 11.2%; 95% CI, -11.6% to 33.0%). Higher-quartile programs were more active on Twitter and exhibited increased numbers of likes and followers. Analysis of US News & World Report rankings revealed that ranked programs had higher rates of presence, activity, and popularity on both Facebook and Twitter. However, these were smaller differences than seen when comparing Doximity Residency Navigator rankings. Correlation between the 2 ranking systems was indicated (Spearman ρ = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.76).

Conclusions and relevance: This study suggests that otolaryngology residency programs with higher Doximity Residency Navigator reputation rankings have a stronger presence on social media. Smaller trends were observed for programs in the top 50 US News & World Report rankings. Overall, social media use among otolaryngology programs seems relatively low, and this may present an opportunity to increase communication with the public via these technologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Social Media Use Based on Doximity Residency Navigator Reputation Ranking
Facebook (A) and Twitter (B) use among otolaryngology residency programs stratified by program quartile.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Social Media Use Based on US News & World Report Ranking
Facebook (A) and Twitter (B) use among otolaryngology residency programs stratified by program quartile.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Correlation Between Doximity Residency Navigator and US News & World Report Ranking

References

    1. Fox S, Duggan M.. Health Online 2013 Pew Research Center Website. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/. Published January 15, 2013. Accessed June 24, 2017.
    1. Fox S. The social life of health information. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/01/15/the-social-life-of-healt.... Published January 15, 2014. Accessed June 24, 2017.
    1. Steehler KR, Steehler MK, Pierce ML, Harley EH. Social media’s role in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery: informing clinicians, empowering patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149(4):521-524. - PubMed
    1. Sarker A, Ginn R, Nikfarjam A, et al. . Utilizing social media data for pharmacovigilance: A review. J Biomed Inform. 2015;54:202-212. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robinson J, Cox G, Bailey E, et al. . Social media and suicide prevention: a systematic review. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2016;10(2):103-121. doi:10.1111/eip.12229 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types