Association of Early Palliative Care With Chemotherapy Intensity in Patients With Advanced Stage Lung Cancer: A National Cohort Study
- PMID: 30336324
- PMCID: PMC6348039
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.09.029
Association of Early Palliative Care With Chemotherapy Intensity in Patients With Advanced Stage Lung Cancer: A National Cohort Study
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with advanced lung cancer have a poor prognosis, but both chemotherapy and early palliative care (EPC) have been shown to improve survival and quality of life (QOL). The relationship between palliative care and receipt of chemotherapy receipt is understudied. We sought to determine if EPC is associated with chemotherapy receipt and intensity among patients with advanced stage lung cancer.
Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients in the national Veterans Health Administration (VA) with stage IIIB or IV lung cancer diagnosed between January 2007- December 2013. EPC was defined as a specialist-delivered palliative care received within 90 days of cancer diagnosis. Outcomes included any chemotherapy receipt and high-intensity chemotherapy receipt defined as: i) more than 4 cycles of a platinum-based doublet, ii) ≥3 lines of chemotherapy, iii) Bevacizumab/Cetuximab triplet therapy, iv) Erlotinib use prior to 2011, and v) chemotherapy in the last days of life. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between EPC and chemotherapy receipt after adjustment for patient and tumor characteristics.
Results: Among the entire cohort (N=23,566), 37% received EPC and 45% received any chemotherapy. Among those with EPC, 34% received chemotherapy compared to 51% among those without EPC (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.51-0.58). Patients who received EPC had reduced receipt of high-intensity chemotherapy including >4 cycles of platinum-based doublet (AOR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.60-0.77), ≥ 3 lines of chemotherapy (AOR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.53-0.71), triplet therapy (AOR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.56-0.82) and use of erlotinib prior to 2011 (AOR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.55-0.79). Patients with EPC were more likely to receive chemotherapy in the last 14 (AOR=1.65, 95% CI: 1.44-1.87) and 30 days (AOR=1.67, 95% CI: 1.51-1.85) of life compared to those without EPC.
Conclusions: EPC was associated with reduced receipt of both any chemotherapy and high-intensity chemotherapy. However, receipt of chemotherapy at the very end-of-life was increased among patients with EPC compared to those without EPC. Among patients with advanced lung cancer, EPC may optimize patient selection for chemotherapy receipt leading to reduced use of high-intensity therapy by focusing on quality of life in accordance with patients' performance, preferences and goals of care.
Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Statement: All authors declare no conflicts of interest with the work presented in this manuscript.
Similar articles
-
Association of Palliative Care Use and Setting With Health-care Utilization and Quality of Care at the End of Life Among Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer.Chest. 2020 Dec;158(6):2667-2674. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.018. Epub 2020 Jun 23. Chest. 2020. PMID: 32589949 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Early Palliative Care Use With Survival and Place of Death Among Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer Receiving Care in the Veterans Health Administration.JAMA Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;5(12):1702-1709. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.3105. JAMA Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31536133 Free PMC article.
-
The rise of concurrent care for veterans with advanced cancer at the end of life.Cancer. 2016 Mar 1;122(5):782-90. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29827. Epub 2015 Dec 15. Cancer. 2016. PMID: 26670795
-
Optimal duration of chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2007 Feb;8(1):38-46. doi: 10.1007/s11864-007-0020-6. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17634834 Review.
-
Chemotherapy use and quality of life in cancer patients at the end of life: an integrative review.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 7;18(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01580-0. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 33028381 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting the Recurrence of Stage IV Colorectal Cancer After Tumor Resection.Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 13;10(1):2519. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59115-y. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32054897 Free PMC article.
-
Survival Analysis of Antineoplastic Treatment for Older Patients with Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Clinical Database Study.Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Dec 16;12:12957-12964. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S282481. eCollection 2020. Cancer Manag Res. 2020. PMID: 33376393 Free PMC article.
-
End-of-life care trajectories among older adults with lung cancer.J Geriatr Oncol. 2023 Jan;14(1):101381. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.09.010. Epub 2022 Oct 4. J Geriatr Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36202695 Free PMC article.
-
Trends and outcomes of early and late palliative care consultation for adult patients with glioblastoma: A SEER-Medicare retrospective study.Neurooncol Pract. 2022 Mar 30;9(4):299-309. doi: 10.1093/nop/npac026. eCollection 2022 Aug. Neurooncol Pract. 2022. PMID: 35859543 Free PMC article.
-
Relationships among clinicians are crucial to successful palliative care integration: a qualitative study in lung cancer.Future Oncol. 2023 Jan;19(3):245-257. doi: 10.2217/fon-2022-0958. Epub 2023 Mar 28. Future Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36974605 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2018;68(1):7–30. - PubMed
-
- Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer. Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. 2016;11(1):39–51. - PubMed
-
- Mountain CF. Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer. Chest. 1997; 111 (6): 1710–1717. - PubMed
-
- Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(14): 1715–1724. - PubMed
-
- Pater JL, Loeb M. Nonanatomic prognostic factors in carcinoma of the lung: a multivariate analysis. Cancer. 1982;50(2):326–331. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical