Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Oct 17;10(10):1524.
doi: 10.3390/nu10101524.

APOE4 Genotype Exerts Greater Benefit in Lowering Plasma Cholesterol and Apolipoprotein B than Wild Type (E3/E3), after Replacement of Dietary Saturated Fats with Low Glycaemic Index Carbohydrates

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

APOE4 Genotype Exerts Greater Benefit in Lowering Plasma Cholesterol and Apolipoprotein B than Wild Type (E3/E3), after Replacement of Dietary Saturated Fats with Low Glycaemic Index Carbohydrates

Bruce A Griffin et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

We examined the impact of APOE genotype on plasma lipids and glucose in a secondary analysis of data from a five-arm, randomised controlled, parallel dietary intervention trial ('RISCK' study), to investigate the impact of replacing saturated fatty acids (SFA) with either monounsaturated fat (MUFA) or carbohydrate of high or low glycaemic index (GI) on CVD risk factors and insulin sensitivity. We tested the impact of APOE genotype (carriage of E2 and E4 alleles versus E3/E3), determined retrospectively, on plasma lipids, lipoproteins and glucose homeostasis at baseline (n = 469), and on the change in these variables after 24 weeks of dietary intervention (n = 389). At baseline, carriers of E2 (n = 70), E4 (n = 125) and E3/E3 (n = 274) expressed marked differences in total plasma cholesterol (TC, p = 0.001), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C, p < 0.0001), apolipoprotein B (apo B, p < 0.0001) and total to high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TC:HDL-C, p = 0.002), with plasma concentrations decreasing in the order E4 > E3/E3 > E2. Following intervention, there was evidence of a significant diet x genotype interaction with significantly greater decreases in TC (p = 0.02) and apo B (p = 0.006) among carriers of E4 when SFA was replaced with low GI carbohydrate on a lower fat diet (TC -0.28 mmol/L p = 0.03; apo B -0.1 g/L p = 0.02), and a relative increase in TC (in comparison to E3/E3) when SFA was replaced with MUFA and high GI carbohydrates (TC 0.3 mmol/L, p = 0.03). Among carriers of E2 (compared with E3/E3) there was an increase in triacylglycerol (TAG) when SFA was replaced with MUFA and low GI carbohydrates 0.46 mmol/L p = 0.001). There were no significant interactions between APOE genotype and diet for changes in indices of glucose homeostasis. In conclusion, variations in APOE genotype led to differential effects on the lipid response to the replacement of SFA with MUFA and low GI carbohydrates.

Keywords: LDL cholesterol; apolipoprotein E genotype; polymorphism; saturated fat; ‘RISCK’ study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in plasma total cholesterol (TC), apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and triacylglycerol (TAG) in APOE4, E2 carriers and wild type E3/E3s after 24 weeks of dietary intervention. Bars indicate the absolute changes in plasma TC, apo B, and TAG for E2 carriers, wild type E3/E3s and E4 carriers after each diet, with standard error bars. For TC n = 9–14 (E2s), 32–45 (E3/E3), 15–24 (E4s); for apo B n = 8–14 (E2s), n = 32–46 (E3/E3), n = 15–25 (E4s); for TAG n = 8–14 (E2s), 31–46 (E3/E3), 15–24 (E4s) per diet group. p-values denote statistical differences between E2 and E3/E3, and E4 and E3/E3. REF: Reference diet HFSA/HGI, HM, LGI, LF as defined in 2.3. Intervention Diets and Study Protocol.

References

    1. Walker C.L. 1983 Nutrition: The changing scene. Implementing the NACNE report. 3. The new British diet. Lancet. 1983;2:1354–1356. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(83)91106-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hooper L., Martin N., Abdelhamid A., Davey-Smith G. Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015;6 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011737. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cox C., Mann J., Sutherland W., Ball M. Individual variation in plasma cholesterol response to dietary saturated fat. BMJ. 1995;311:1260–1264. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7015.1260. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Astrup A., Dyerberg J., Elwood P., Hermansen K., Hu F.B., Jakobsen M.U., Kok F.J., Krauss R.M., Lecerf J.M., LeGrand P., et al. The role of reducing intakes of saturated fat in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: Where does the evidence stand in 2010? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010;93:684–688. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.004622. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siri-Tarino P.W., Chiu S., Bergeron N., Krauss R.M. Saturated fats versus polyunsaturated Fats versus carbohydrates for cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2015;35:517–543. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071714-034449. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms