Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Feb 1;176(2):107-118.
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18040369. Epub 2018 Oct 19.

Genome-Wide Association Study Meta-Analysis of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in Two Population-Based Cohorts

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Genome-Wide Association Study Meta-Analysis of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in Two Population-Based Cohorts

Sandra Sanchez-Roige et al. Am J Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Objective: Alcohol use disorders are common conditions that have enormous social and economic consequences. Genome-wide association analyses were performed to identify genetic variants associated with a proxy measure of alcohol consumption and alcohol misuse and to explore the shared genetic basis between these measures and other substance use, psychiatric, and behavioral traits.

Method: This study used quantitative measures from the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) from two population-based cohorts of European ancestry (UK Biobank [N=121,604] and 23andMe [N=20,328]) and performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis. Two additional GWAS analyses were performed, a GWAS for AUDIT scores on items 1-3, which focus on consumption (AUDIT-C), and for scores on items 4-10, which focus on the problematic consequences of drinking (AUDIT-P).

Results: The GWAS meta-analysis of AUDIT total score identified 10 associated risk loci. Novel associations localized to genes including JCAD and SLC39A13; this study also replicated previously identified signals in the genes ADH1B, ADH1C, KLB, and GCKR. The dimensions of AUDIT showed positive genetic correlations with alcohol consumption (rg=0.76-0.92) and DSM-IV alcohol dependence (rg=0.33-0.63). AUDIT-P and AUDIT-C scores showed significantly different patterns of association across a number of traits, including psychiatric disorders. AUDIT-P score was significantly positively genetically correlated with schizophrenia (rg=0.22), major depressive disorder (rg=0.26), and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (rg=0.23), whereas AUDIT-C score was significantly negatively genetically correlated with major depressive disorder (rg=-0.24) and ADHD (rg=-0.10). This study also used the AUDIT data in the UK Biobank to identify thresholds for dichotomizing AUDIT total score that optimize genetic correlations with DSM-IV alcohol dependence. Coding individuals with AUDIT total scores ≤4 as control subjects and those with scores ≥12 as case subjects produced a significant high genetic correlation with DSM-IV alcohol dependence (rg=0.82) while retaining most subjects.

Conclusions: AUDIT scores ascertained in population-based cohorts can be used to explore the genetic basis of both alcohol consumption and alcohol use disorders.

Keywords: Alcohol Abuse; Alcohol Consumption; Alcohol Dependence; Epidemiology; Genetics; Genome-Wide Association Studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Manhattan and QQ plots for the SNP-based GWAS meta-analysis of AUDIT total score (N = 141,932)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Genetic correlations between the three AUDIT phenotypes (total score, AUDIT-C, AUDIT-P) and several traits measured in independent cohorts as described in the Supplementary Tables 3–5: alcohol-related traits, tobacco and cannabis use, neuropsychiatric, personality, cognition, anthropomorphic and blood lipids. ADHD, attention-deficit/hyper-activity disorder; BMI, body mass index; SE, standard error; IQ, intelligence quotient; HDL, high-density lipoprotein. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.0001; # AUDIT-P vs AUDIT-C, p < 0.01 FDR 5%, (#) AUDIT-P vs AUDIT-C, p < 0.05
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Genetic correlations between AUDIT cases (8 [N = 25,423], 10 [N = 15,151], 12 [N = 9,130], 15 [N = 4,471], 18 [N = 2,099], 20 [N = 1,290]) vs controls (2, 3, 4) in the UK Biobank and DSM-IV derived alcohol dependence from the Psychiatric Genetics Consortium. The orange line is a visualization of the number of cases used at each threshold, corresponding to the N on the right hand y-axis.

Comment in

References

    1. Heath AC, Madden PAF, Bucholz KK, et al. : Genetic differences in alcohol sensitivity and the inheritance of alcoholism risk. Psychol Med 1999; 29:1069–1081 - PubMed
    1. Verhulst B, Neale MC, Kendler KS: The heritability of alcohol use disorders: a meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychol Med 2015; 45:1061–1072 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frank J, Cichon S, Treutlein J, et al. : Genome-wide significant association between alcohol dependence and a variant in the ADH gene cluster: ADH gene cluster and alcohol dependence. Addict Biol 2012; 17:171–180 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kilcoyne B, Shmulewitz D, Meyers JL, et al. : Alcohol Consumption Mediates the Relationship Between ADH1B and DSM-IV Alcohol Use Disorder and Criteria. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2014; 75:635–642 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quillen EE, Chen X-D, Almasy L, et al. : ALDH2 is associated to alcohol dependence and is the major genetic determinant of “daily maximum drinks” in a GWAS study of an isolated rural chinese sample. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2014; 165:103–110 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources