Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Dec;55(6):896-907.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

Prostate Cancer Screening Patient Decision Aids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prostate Cancer Screening Patient Decision Aids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Ilya Ivlev et al. Am J Prev Med. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Context: Although screening recommendations for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen testing often include shared decision making, the effect of patient decision aids on patients' intention and uptake is unclear. This study aimed to review the effect of decision aids on men's screening intention, screening utilization, and the congruence between intentions and uptake.

Evidence acquisition: Data sources were searched through April 6, 2018, and included MEDLINE, Scopus, CENTRAL, CT.gov, Cochrane report, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, and reference lists. This study included RCTs and observational studies of decision aids that measured prostate screening intention or behavior. The analysis was completed in April 2018.

Evidence synthesis: Eighteen studies (13 RCTs, four before-after studies, and one non-RCT) reported data on screening intention for ≅8,400 men and screening uptake for 2,385 men. Compared with usual care, the use of decision aids in any format results in fewer men (aged ≥40 years) planning to undergo prostate-specific antigen testing (risk ratio=0.88, 95% CI=0.81, 0.95, p=0.006, I2=66%, p<0.001, n=8). Many men did not follow their screening intentions during the first year after using a decision aid; however, most men who were planning to undergo screening did so (probability that men who wanted to be screened would receive screening was 95%).

Conclusions: Integration of decision aids in clinical practice may result in a decrease in the number of men who elect prostate-specific antigen testing, which may in turn reduce screening uptake. To ensure high congruence between intention and screening utilization, providers should not delay the shared decision-making discussion after patients use a decision aid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Forest plot of the proportion of men who were planning to undergo PSA-based screening after using various formats of DAs. aEvents – numbers of men who were intended to undergo screening. PSA, prostate-specific antigen; DA, PSA-based prostate cancer screening patient decision aid.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(4):524–548. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen S-L, Wang S-C, Ho C-J, et al. Prostate cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios are associated with cancer care disparities in 35 countries. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40003 10.1038/srep40003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. SEER Cancer Stat Facts: Prostate Cancer. National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html. Published 2017. Accessed December 23, 2017.
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7–30. 10.3322/caac.21387. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Owens DK, et al. Screening for prostate cancer. JAMA. 2018;319(18):1901–1913. 10.1001/jama.2018.3710. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances