Prostate Cancer Screening Patient Decision Aids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 30337235
- PMCID: PMC6467088
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.016
Prostate Cancer Screening Patient Decision Aids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Context: Although screening recommendations for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen testing often include shared decision making, the effect of patient decision aids on patients' intention and uptake is unclear. This study aimed to review the effect of decision aids on men's screening intention, screening utilization, and the congruence between intentions and uptake.
Evidence acquisition: Data sources were searched through April 6, 2018, and included MEDLINE, Scopus, CENTRAL, CT.gov, Cochrane report, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, and reference lists. This study included RCTs and observational studies of decision aids that measured prostate screening intention or behavior. The analysis was completed in April 2018.
Evidence synthesis: Eighteen studies (13 RCTs, four before-after studies, and one non-RCT) reported data on screening intention for ≅8,400 men and screening uptake for 2,385 men. Compared with usual care, the use of decision aids in any format results in fewer men (aged ≥40 years) planning to undergo prostate-specific antigen testing (risk ratio=0.88, 95% CI=0.81, 0.95, p=0.006, I2=66%, p<0.001, n=8). Many men did not follow their screening intentions during the first year after using a decision aid; however, most men who were planning to undergo screening did so (probability that men who wanted to be screened would receive screening was 95%).
Conclusions: Integration of decision aids in clinical practice may result in a decrease in the number of men who elect prostate-specific antigen testing, which may in turn reduce screening uptake. To ensure high congruence between intention and screening utilization, providers should not delay the shared decision-making discussion after patients use a decision aid.
Copyright © 2018 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Web-Based Versus Usual Care and Other Formats of Decision Aids to Support Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 26;20(6):e228. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9070. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 29945857 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of explicit values clarification method (VCM), implicit VCM and no VCM decision aids for men considering prostate cancer screening: protocol of a randomized trial.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Apr 29;20(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1094-3. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020. PMID: 32349746 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of a printed decision aid on patients' intention to undergo prostate cancer screening: a multicentre, pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care.Br J Gen Pract. 2015 May;65(634):e295-304. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X684817. Br J Gen Pract. 2015. PMID: 25918334 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Shared decision making for prostate cancer screening: the results of a combined analysis of two practice-based randomized controlled trials.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Nov 13;12:130. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-130. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012. PMID: 23148458 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Values and preferences of men for undergoing prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 5;8(9):e025470. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025470. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30185585 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Tools to Promote Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose CT Scanning: A Systematic Review.Chest. 2020 Dec;158(6):2646-2657. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.610. Epub 2020 Jul 3. Chest. 2020. PMID: 32629037 Free PMC article.
-
Preparing African American Men to Make Informed Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions: Development and Pilot Testing of an Interactive Online Decision Aid.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 5;8(5):e15502. doi: 10.2196/15502. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 32369032 Free PMC article.
-
Decision aid and cost compensation influence uptake of PSA-based early detection without affecting decisional conflict: a cluster randomised trial.Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 6;11(1):23503. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02696-z. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34873188 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of a Prostate Cancer Screening Decision Aid for African-American Men in Primary Care Settings.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Nov;29(11):2157-2164. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0454. Epub 2020 Aug 27. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020. PMID: 32855264 Free PMC article.
-
Shared decision-making before prostate cancer screening decisions.Nat Rev Urol. 2024 Jun;21(6):329-338. doi: 10.1038/s41585-023-00840-0. Epub 2024 Jan 2. Nat Rev Urol. 2024. PMID: 38168921 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(4):524–548. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- SEER Cancer Stat Facts: Prostate Cancer. National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html. Published 2017. Accessed December 23, 2017.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous