Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 8:7:121.
doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0408-z. eCollection 2018.

Prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, multidrug resistant and extended spectrum β-lactamase producing gram negative bacilli causing wound infections at a tertiary care hospital of Nepal

Affiliations

Prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, multidrug resistant and extended spectrum β-lactamase producing gram negative bacilli causing wound infections at a tertiary care hospital of Nepal

Narbada Upreti et al. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. .

Abstract

Background: Treatment and prevention of wound infection continues to be a challenging issue in clinical settings of Nepal especially in the context of globally growing problem of antimicrobial resistance. Study on opportunistic pathogens and sensitivity to commonly prescribed local antimicrobial agents are cardinal to reduce the disease burden of wound infections. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria from wound infections of patients at a tertiary care hospital in Nepal.

Methods: Pus specimens were processed using standard microbiological procedures. Antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed following the modified Kirby Bauer disc diffusion technique. Clinical information of patients was obtained from preformed questionnaire and hospital record.

Results: One hundred eighty two pus specimens from wounds of different body parts: leg, hand, backside, abdominal part, foot, breast and chest, head and neck region were collected and analyzed; 113 bacterial isolates were isolated showing the overall bacterial growth rate of 62%, where the highest rate was among patients of ≤10 years age group (82.1%). A higher rate (68.5%) of bacterial isolates were from inpatients (p < 0.05). Among 116 bacterial isolates, Staphylococcus aureus was the most predominant bacteria (56.9%) followed by Escherichia coli (8.6%), coagulase negative staphylococci (7.8%), Acinetobacter spp. (5.2%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (5.2%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4.3%), Enterococcus spp. (4.3%), Citrobacter freundii (2.6%), Proteus vulgaris (1.6%) and P. mirabilis (0.9%). Both Gram positive (73.3%) and negative (78.8%) isolates showed high frequency of sensitive to gentamycin.

Conclusion: Among S. aureus isolates, 60.6% were MRSA strains, whereas 40% of K. pneumoniae and 33.3% of C. freundii were ESBL producing bacteria followed by E. coli (25%). It is thus paramount to address the burden of silently and speedily increasing infections caused by drug resistant strains of MRSA and ESBL in Nepal.

Keywords: ESBL; Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Multidrug resistant; Nepal; Wound infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Review Board (IERB) of KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal before the study. The issued letter of IERB (IRC no. 0041/2013/2014) can be presented on reasonable request. Written consent was taken from all the patients in local language before sample collection. This manuscript does not contain any individual human or animal data or tissue.Not applicable.The authors declare they do not have any competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Percentage of bacterial growth in pus swab and aspirated pus swab

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moet GJ, Jones RN, Biedenbach DJ, Stilwell MG, Fritsche TR. Contemporary causes of skin and soft tissue infections in North America, Latin America, and Europe: report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (1998–2004) Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;57(1):7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.05.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oluwatosin OM. Surgical wound infection: a general overview. Ann Ibadan Postgrad Med. 2005;3(2):26–31.
    1. Collier M. Wound-bed management: key principles for practice. Professional nurse (London, England) 2002. pp. 221–225. - PubMed
    1. Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS. Overview of bacterial identification methods and strategies. Bailey and Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology. Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. pp. 216–247.
    1. Mama M, Abdissa A, Sewunet T. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates from wound infection and their sensitivity to alternative topical agents at Jimma University specialized hospital, south-West Ethiopia. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2014;13(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-13-14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms