Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 13;5(4):358-361.
doi: 10.1002/ams2.362. eCollection 2018 Oct.

Successful management of cesarean scar pregnancy with vacuum extraction under ultrasound guidance

Affiliations

Successful management of cesarean scar pregnancy with vacuum extraction under ultrasound guidance

Görker Sel et al. Acute Med Surg. .

Abstract

Aim: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare type of ectopic pregnancy. The gestational sac is implanted in the myometrium at the site of a previous cesarean section. Mothers with CSP are faced with risks of unpredictable massive bleeding or more fatal complications. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and reliability of the intraoperative ultrasound-guided vacuum aspiration method as an effective treatment option for CSP.

Methods: We undertook a retrospective analysis of CSP patients who had undergone the vacuum aspiration method, by reviewing patient records from the period October 2015 to January 2018. All of the operations were carried out under general anesthesia, with patients in the lithotomy position, using suprapubic ultrasonography guidance. A vacuum aspirator was used to aspirate the whole pregnancy material without perforating the previous cesarean section scar.

Results: Ten women with CSP were managed successfully by ultrasound-guided vacuum extraction without complications or further interventions, such as reoperation or methotrexate administration. Three of the 10 patients needed uterine Foley catheter tampon (50 cc) for 4 h after vacuum extraction alone was applied. During the study period, two additional patients who did not meet the criteria for the vacuum extraction method alone were managed with methotrexate plus vacuum application. Because of the rarity of the condition, the majority of CSPs are case reports or small case series reported in published works, with no consensus on the preferred course of treatment.

Conclusion: The vacuum extraction method seems to be a good and practical way of treating CSP. Comparisons of efficacy should be undertaken but large sample sizes are required. We hope this study brings a new perspective for larger sample-sized studies, considering the technique is feasible and applicable.

Keywords: cannula; cesarean scar; cesarean scar pregnancy; ectopic pregnancy; vacuum extraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2007; 114: 253–63. - PubMed
    1. Jiang T, Liu G, Huang L, Ma H, Zhang S. Methotrexate therapy followed by suction curettage followed by Foley tamponade for caesarean scar pregnancy. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2011; 156: 209–11. - PubMed
    1. Larsen JV, Solomon MH. Pregnancy in a uterine scar sacculus: an unusual cause of postabortal hemorrhage. A case report. S. Afr. Med. J. 1978; 53: 142–3. - PubMed
    1. Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, Lin MY, Tsai YL, Hwang JL. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2004; 23: 247–53. - PubMed
    1. OECD . Caesarean sections (indicator); 2018. 10.1787/adc3c39f-en (Accessed on 21 January 2018). - DOI

LinkOut - more resources