Montgomery and shared decision-making: implications for good psychiatric practice
- PMID: 30339110
- DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2018.180
Montgomery and shared decision-making: implications for good psychiatric practice
Abstract
The 2015 Supreme Court judgment in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 established that consent to medical treatment requires shared decision-making based on dialogue between the clinician and patient. In this editorial, we examine what Montgomery means for standards of good psychiatric practice, and argue that it represents an opportunity for delivering best practice in psychiatric care.Declaration of interestNone.
Keywords: Ethics; consent and capacity; psychiatry and law.
Comment in
-
Montgomery and changes to the process of consent: debate required.Br J Psychiatry. 2019 May;214(5):307. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.67. Br J Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 31012413 No abstract available.
-
Author's reply.Br J Psychiatry. 2019 May;214(5):307. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.68. Br J Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 31012414 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
