Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb:106:108-120.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

The QuinteT Recruitment Intervention supported five randomized trials to recruit to target: a mixed-methods evaluation

Leila Rooshenas  1 , Lauren J Scott  2 , Jane M Blazeby  3 , Chris A Rogers  4 , Kate M Tilling  3 , Samantha Husbands  3 , Carmel Conefrey  3 , Nicola Mills  3 , Robert C Stein  5 , Chris Metcalfe  3 , Andrew J Carr  6 , David J Beard  7 , Tim Davis  8 , Sangeetha Paramasivan  3 , Marcus Jepson  3 , Kerry Avery  3 , Daisy Elliott  3 , Caroline Wilson  3 , Jenny L Donovan  9 ; By-Band-Sleeve study group; CSAW study group; HAND-1 study group; Optima prelim study group; Romio feasibility study group
Collaborators, Affiliations

The QuinteT Recruitment Intervention supported five randomized trials to recruit to target: a mixed-methods evaluation

Leila Rooshenas et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of the QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) on recruitment in challenging randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have applied the intervention. The QRI aims to understand recruitment difficulties and then implements "QRI actions" to address these as recruitment proceeds.

Study design and setting: A mixed-methods study, comprising (1) before-and-after comparisons of recruitment rates and the numbers of patients approached and (2) qualitative case studies, including documentary analysis and interviews with RCT investigators.

Results: Five UK-based publicly funded RCTs were included in the evaluation. All recruited to target. Randomized controlled trial 2 and RCT 5 both received up-front prerecruitment training before the intervention was applied. Randomized controlled trial 2 did not encounter recruitment issues and recruited above target from its outset. Recruitment difficulties, particularly communication issues, were identified and addressed through QRI actions in RCTs 1, 3, 4, and 5. Randomization rates significantly improved after QRI action in RCTs 1, 3, and 4. Quintet Recruitment Intervention actions addressed issues with approaching eligible patients in RCTs 3 and 5, which both saw significant increases in the number of patients approached. Trial investigators reported that the QRI had unearthed issues they had been unaware of and reportedly changed their practices after QRI action.

Conclusion: There is promising evidence to suggest that the QRI can support recruitment to difficult RCTs. This needs to be substantiated with future controlled evaluations.

Keywords: Clinical trial; Communication; Qualitative research; Randomized controlled trial; Recruitment; Training healthcare professionals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Timeline of RCTs, with points of QRI integration and point at which QRI actions were implemented. RCT, Randomized controlled trial; QRI, QuinteT Recruitment Intervention.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Results of analysis 1 (change in randomization success, preintervention and postintervention) and analysis 2 (changes in the numbers of patients approached, preintervention and postintervention). Panel A: Odds ratio of randomization success after the first QRI action, shown for individual trials. Panel B: Incident rate ratios (IRR) of eligible and approached (E&A) patients after the first QRI action, shown for individual trials. RCT, Randomized controlled trial; QRI, QuinteT Recruitment Intervention.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kasenda B., Von Elm E., You J., Blümle A., Tomonaga Y., Saccilotto R. Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials. JAMA. 2014;311:1045–1052. - PubMed
    1. Watson J.M., Torgerson D.J. Increasing recruitment to randomized trials: a review of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Treweek S., Altman D.G., Bower P., Campbell M., Chalmers I., Cotton S. Making randomized trials more efficient: report of the first meeting to discuss the trial forge platform. Trials. 2015;16(1):261. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loudon K., Treweek S., Sullivan F., Donnan P., Thorpe K.E., Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015;350:h2147. - PubMed
    1. Walters S.J., Bonacho dos Anjos Henriques-Cadby I., Bortolami O., Flight L., Hind D., Jacques R.M. Recruitment and retention of participants in randomized controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme. BMJ Open. 2017;7(3):e015276. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources