Complementary and alternative medicine use among persons with multiple chronic conditions: results from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey
- PMID: 30340577
- PMCID: PMC6194645
- DOI: 10.1186/s12906-018-2342-2
Complementary and alternative medicine use among persons with multiple chronic conditions: results from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey
Abstract
Background: Although a quarter of Americans are estimated to have multiple chronic conditions, information on the impact of chronic disease dyads and triads on use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is scarce. The purpose of this study is to: 1) estimate the prevalence and odds of CAM use among participants with hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes, and obesity; and 2) examine the effects of chronic condition dyads and triads on the use of CAM modalities, specifically manipulative and body-based methods, biological treatments, mind-body interventions, energy therapies, and alternative medical systems.
Methods: Data were obtained from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey and the Adult Alternative Medicine supplement. Statistical analyses were restricted to persons with self-reported hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes, or obesity (n = 15,463).
Results: Approximately 37.2% of the participants had just one of the four chronic conditions, while 62.4% self-reported multiple comorbidities. CAM use among participants was as follows (p < 0.001): hypercholesterolemia (31.5%), hypertension (28.3%), diabetes (25.0%), and obesity (10.8%). All combinations of disease dyads and triads were consistently and significantly associated with the use of mind-body interventions (2-4%, p < 0.001). Two sets of three dyads were associated with use of manipulative methods (23-27%, p < 0.05) and energy therapies (0.2-0.3%, p < 0.05). Use of biological treatments (0.04%, p < 0.05) and alternative systems (3%, p < 0.05) were each significant for one dyad. One triad was significant for use of manipulative methods (27%, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: These findings point to future directions for research and have practical implications for family practitioners treating multimorbid patients.
Keywords: Chronic disease; Comorbidity; Complementary and alternative medicine; Diabetes; Hypercholesterolemia; Hypertension; Integrative medicine; Obesity.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the University of West Florida’s Institutional Review Board for Human Research Participants Protection (UWF IRB #2018–187). Informed consent was deemed unnecessary during IRB review due to the use of secondary data from a nationally-administered survey and available for public use at:
Consent for publication
Not applicable [This manuscript does not contain data from any individual person.]
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institutes of Health or any other government agency.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures



References
-
- Straus SE. Expanding horizons of healthcare: five-year strategic plan, 2001-2005. Bethesda: NIH; 2000. p. 1–47.
-
- Nahin RL, Barnes PM, Stussman BJ, Bloom B. Costs of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and frequency of visits to CAM practitioners: United States, 2007. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2009;18:1–16. - PubMed
-
- Barnes PM, Bloom B, Nahin RL. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2008;12:1–24. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical