Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1987 Apr;53(4):761-7.
doi: 10.1128/aem.53.4.761-767.1987.

Comparison of methods for rotavirus detection in water and results of a survey of Jerusalem wastewater

Comparative Study

Comparison of methods for rotavirus detection in water and results of a survey of Jerusalem wastewater

N Guttman-Bass et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Apr.

Abstract

Methods for the detection of viable rotaviruses and rotavirus antigen in water were developed and compared. The methods included laboratory-developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) with chromogenic and luminescent substrates, commercial Rotazyme and Enzygnost ELISAs, and an indirect immunofluorescent assay. Of the methods tested, the immunofluorescent assay and the Enzygnost ELISA were the most sensitive for the simian rotavirus SA-11. All of the methods were positive for human rotavirus from clinical specimens. Seeded SA-11 rotavirus was concentrated from water by absorption to and elution from Zeta Plus filters followed by organic flocculation. Interference with the assays by components of the wastewater concentrates was minimal for the ELISAs, although the undiluted organic flocs were cytotoxic for the immunofluorescent assay. A survey of Jerusalem wastewater was carried out over the course of 1 year, and samples were assayed for rotaviruses and enteroviruses. Although enteroviruses were found in almost all of the samples, all samples were negative for rotaviruses. The concentration of rotaviruses in the wastewater was thus below the detection limit of the method used.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Med Virol. 1979;3(3):189-94 - PubMed
    1. J Immunol Methods. 1979;30(3):245-55 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jun;43(6):1440-50 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Mar;45(3):850-5 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Jul;46(1):133-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources