Outcomes of adult urethroplasty with commercially available acellular matrix
- PMID: 30344647
- PMCID: PMC6180383
- DOI: 10.1177/1756287218790370
Outcomes of adult urethroplasty with commercially available acellular matrix
Abstract
Background: Reconstruction for complex urethral strictures may necessitate grafting. Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) harvest involves additional morbidity, making 'off-the-shelf' options attractive. Multiple extracellular matrices (ECMs) have been used with varying degrees of success. We reviewed our experience with MatriStem (ACell, Inc., Columbia, MD, USA) to assess safety and clinical/histologic outcomes.
Methods: All patients undergoing acellular matrix-based reconstruction were included. Data regarding indications for surgery, patient demographics, subsequent procedures, clinical outcomes, and histologic analysis, when present, were collected.
Results: Eight patients undergoing urethral reconstruction with ECM were identified. All repairs were performed as staged procedures. Grafting was performed with either MatriStem alone or MatriStem and concomitant BMG. Seven patients (88%) underwent prior endoscopic intervention and five patients (71%) had failed to respond to one or multiple prior urethroplasties. Length of involved segments ranged from 2.5 to 15 cm. ECM graft placement was feasible and demonstrated excellent graft take. Among patients undergoing second-stage repairs (four of eight, 50%), 50% remained patent without the need for subsequent dilation.
Conclusions: Use of acellular matrix grafts in urethral reconstruction appears safe and feasible. Acellular matrix performs similarly to BMG with respect to graft take and contraction following staged repair. Further study is warranted.
Keywords: acellular matrix; off-the-shelf; reconstruction; urethral stricture disease; urethroplasty.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Santucci RA, Joyce GF, Wise M. Male urethral stricture disease. J Urol 2007; 177: 1667–1674. - PubMed
-
- Mangera A, Chapple C. Management of anterior urethral stricture: an evidence-based approach. Curr Opin Urol 2010; 20: 453–458. - PubMed
-
- Lumen N, Oosterlinck W, Hoebeke P. Urethral reconstruction using buccal mucosa or penile skin grafts: systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int 2012; 89: 387–394. - PubMed
-
- Jang TL, Erickson B, Medendorp A, et al. Comparison of donor site intraoral morbidity after mucosal graft harvesting for urethral reconstruction. Urol 2005; 66: 716–720. - PubMed
-
- Dublin N, Stewart LH. Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty. BJU Int 2004; 94: 867–869. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
