Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2018 Oct;31(5):261-266.

Patient- and treatment-related factors may influence the longevity of primary teeth restorations in high caries-risk children: A university-based retrospective study

Affiliations
  • PMID: 30346673
Clinical Trial

Patient- and treatment-related factors may influence the longevity of primary teeth restorations in high caries-risk children: A university-based retrospective study

Débora Martini Dalpian et al. Am J Dent. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the longevity and factors associated with failure of primary teeth restorations placed in high caries-risk children.

Methods: The sample was comprised of children treated in a University Dental Service. Patients' records were screened retrospectively to determine whether they had received restorative treatment in primary teeth presenting cavitated caries lesions. Kaplan-Meier estimator and Multivariate Cox regression analysis with shared frailty were used to assess restorations' survival and factors associated with failure, respectively.

Results: 123 high caries-risk children (10.3±4 DMF-T) with 316 restorations were analyzed. The 3-year survival reached 53.4% (AFR=18.8%). Restorations placed without rubber dam (P= 0.04), over selective caries removal (P= 0.03), with calcium hydroxide liner (P< 0.01) and glass-ionomer cement (P= 0.04) presented lower survival rates. Caries-controlled patients presented significantly (P= 0.03) higher rates of restoration survival (77.7%) than caries-active patients (49.9%). The adjusted model showed that restorations placed in teeth after selective caries removal showed 3.41 times higher risk of failure compared with restorations over complete caries removal (95%CI:1.37-8.46).

Clinical significance: Adhesive restorations placed in high-caries experience patients have limited survival rates. Some treatment-related factors may influence the performance of these restorations. A strict preventive regimen to control dental caries activity must be followed in order to increase the restoration survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no conflict of interest. The study was funded by FAPERGS (project# 16/2551-0000471-4 PRONEX).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources