You Can't Find Healthy Food in the Bush: Poor Accessibility, Availability and Adequacy of Food in Rural Australia
- PMID: 30347893
- PMCID: PMC6210532
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15102316
You Can't Find Healthy Food in the Bush: Poor Accessibility, Availability and Adequacy of Food in Rural Australia
Abstract
In high-income countries, obesity disproportionately affects those from disadvantaged and rural areas. Poor diet is a modifiable risk factor for obesity and the food environment a primary driver of poor diet. In rural and disadvantaged communities, it is harder to access affordable and nutritious food, affecting both food insecurity and the health of rural residents. This paper aims to describe the food environment in a rural Australian community (approx. 7000 km² in size) to inform the development of community-relevant food supply interventions. We conducted a census audit of the food environment (ground truthing) of a local government area (LGA). We used the Nutrition Environment Measurement tools (NEMS-S and NEMS-R) to identify availability of a range of food and non-alcoholic beverages, the relative price of a healthy compared to a less healthy option of a similar food type (e.g., bread), the quality of fresh produce and any in-store nutrition promotion. Thirty-eight food retail outlets operated at the time of our study and all were included, 11 food stores (NEMS-S) and 27 food service outlets (NEMS-R). The mean NEMS-S score for all food stores was 21/54 points (39%) and mean NEMS-R score for all food service outlets was 3/23 points (13%); indicative of limited healthier options at relatively higher prices. It is difficult to buy healthy food beyond the supermarkets and one (of seven) cafés across the LGA. Residents demonstrate strong loyalty to local food outlets, providing scope to work with this existing infrastructure to positively impact poor diet and improve food security.
Keywords: food security; food supply; obesity; rural.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
References
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . In: Australian Burden of Disease Study: Impact and Causes of Illness and Death in Australia 2011.S Bod 4. AIHW, editor. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; Canberra, Australia: 2016.
-
- Forouzanfar M.H., Alexander L., Anderson H.R., Bachman V.F., Biryukov S., Brauer M., Burnett R., Casey D., Coates M.M., Cohen A., et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:2287–2323. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00128-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Rahmanian E., Gasevic D., Vukmirovich I., Lear S.A. The association between the built environment and dietary intake-a systematic review. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014;23:183–196. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical