Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 22;13(1):183.
doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0930-3.

Investigating the landscape of US orphan product approvals

Affiliations

Investigating the landscape of US orphan product approvals

Kathleen L Miller et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The Orphan Drug Act was enacted in 1983 to encourage the development of drugs for rare diseases. Previous research has attempted to examine the impact of the Act by assessing either the number of orphan designations that have been granted or the number of new orphan drugs approved for marketing. This study provides a more in-depth understanding of the effect of the Orphan Drug Act by investigating all types of drug approvals with an orphan designation, along with multiple characteristics of the drugs, over the entire 35 years of the Act. These orphan approvals include: new molecular entities (new drugs approved first for a rare disease), secondary indications (an expansion from the first approved indication), and new formulations.

Results: The results show that the number of approvals for orphan indications has been increasing over time, and the upward trend is especially large in the most recent years. Much of this increase has been driven by the increase in secondary indications being approved for previously approved drugs, although there have also been increases in the number of approved new drugs. We also find that while oncology indications have been increasing significantly, there has also been an increase in other therapeutic areas. Additionally, we find that the proportion of biologic drugs being approved has increased over time. Lastly, while other parts of this drug landscape have dramatically altered over time, the proportion of orphan approvals receiving priority review has not changed.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that the Orphan Drug Act appears to have stimulated significant drug development for rare diseases. Additionally, approvals of orphan indications have been increasing over time. This increasing effect has not targeted a single area of the rare disease space, rather, gains in approvals have been seen across: therapeutic areas, approval types (both new drugs and secondary indications), and for both biologics and small molecule drugs.

Keywords: FDA; Orphan drug act; Orphan products.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Orphan Drug Approvals 1983–2017, by regulatory approval type
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Orphan Drug Approvals 1993–2017, by priority vs standard review designation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Orphan Drug Approvals 1993–2017, by drug versus biologic
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Orphan Approvals, by therapeutic area
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Orphan Approvals by therapeutic area, in 5-year periods
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Orphan approvals, by decade, by multiple characteristics

References

    1. Seoane-Vazquez E, et al. Incentives for orphan drug research and development in the United States. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008;3(1):33. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-3-33. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tambuyzer E. Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(12):921. doi: 10.1038/nrd3275. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wellman-Labadie O, Zhou Y. The US orphan drug act: rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity? Health Policy. 2010;95(2):216–228. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.12.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braun MM, et al. Emergence of orphan drugs in the United States: a quantitative assessment of the first 25 years. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(7):519–522. doi: 10.1038/nrd3160. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haffner ME. Adopting orphan drugs—two dozen years of treating rare diseases. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(5):445–447. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058317. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources