Emergency medical services for acute ischemic stroke: Hub-and-spoke model versus exclusive care in comprehensive centers
- PMID: 30348588
- PMCID: PMC6326836
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.031
Emergency medical services for acute ischemic stroke: Hub-and-spoke model versus exclusive care in comprehensive centers
Abstract
Background: The emergent disposition of acute stroke patients remains an issue of debate. We investigated whether a hub-and-spoke model was associated with worse stroke outcomes when compared to care exclusively in comprehensive centers.
Methods: We performed a cohort study of all acute ischemic stroke patients who were hospitalized in endovascular-capable facilities, and were registered in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database from 2009 to 2015. We examined the association of transfer status (transfer to endovascular capable hospitals versus initial treatment in these facilities) with inpatient case-fatality, discharge to a facility, and length of stay (LOS). An instrumental variable analysis was used to control for unmeasured confounding and simulate a randomized trial.
Results: During the study period, 128,122 acute stroke patients met inclusion criteria. Instrumental variable analysis demonstrated that patients transferred to endovascular-capable hospitals did not have higher case-fatality (Adjusted difference, 4.4%; 95% CI, -0.1% to 9.0%), rate discharge to a facility (Adjusted difference, -2.3%; 95% CI, -5.2% to 0.6%), or longer LOS (Adjusted difference, 4.2; 95% CI, -2.2 to 10.1) in comparison to patients presenting for initial treatment in these facilities. The same associations were present when restricting the cohort to patients receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen (IV-tPA) and to patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy.
Conclusions: Using a comprehensive all-payer cohort of acute ischemic stroke patients in New York State we demonstrated that patients treated in a hub-and-spoke model were not associated with worse outcomes than patients receiving care exclusively in comprehensive institutions. This needs to be taken into consideration when considering acute emergency services in this setting.
Keywords: Acute ischemic stroke; Center of excellence; Endovascular treatments; Hub-and-spoke; SPARCS; Transfer.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts to disclose
References
-
- Ng FC, Low E, Andrew E, Smith K, Campbell BCV, Hand PJ, et al. Deconstruction of Interhospital Transfer Workflow in Large Vessel Occlusion: Real-World Data in the Thrombectomy Era. Stroke 2017;48(7):1976–9. - PubMed
-
- McTaggart RA, Ansari SA, Goyal M, Abruzzo TA, Albani B, Arthur AJ, et al. Initial hospital management of patients with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO): report of the standards and guidelines committee of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9(3):316–23. - PubMed
-
- Mokin M, Snyder KV, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI, Hopkins LN. Recent Endovascular Stroke Trials and Their Impact on Stroke Systems of Care. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67(22):2645–55. - PubMed
-
- Kunz WG, Hunink MG, Sommer WH, Beyer SE, Meinel FG, Dorn F, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Stroke Therapy: A Patient Subgroup Analysis From a US Healthcare Perspective. Stroke 2016;47(11):2797–804. - PubMed
-
- Milne MS, Holodinsky JK, Hill MD, Nygren A, Qiu C, Goyal M, et al. Drip ‘n Ship Versus Mothership for Endovascular Treatment: Modeling the Best Transportation Options for Optimal Outcomes. Stroke 2017;48(3):791–4. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous