Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;2(11):1808-1817.
doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0690-4. Epub 2018 Oct 22.

Phylogenetic patterns and phenotypic profiles of the species of plants and mammals farmed for food

Affiliations
Free article

Phylogenetic patterns and phenotypic profiles of the species of plants and mammals farmed for food

Rubén Milla et al. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

The origins of agriculture were key events in human history, during which people came to depend for their food on small numbers of animal and plant species. However, the biological traits determining which species were domesticated for food provision, and which were not, are unclear. Here, we investigate the phylogenetic distribution of livestock and crops, and compare their phenotypic traits with those of wild species. Our results indicate that phylogenetic clustering is modest for crop species but more intense for livestock. Domesticated species explore a reduced portion of the phenotypic space occupied by their wild counterparts and have particular traits in common. For example, herbaceous crops are globally characterized by traits including high leaf nitrogen concentration and tall canopies, which make them fast-growing species and proficient competitors. Livestock species are relatively large mammals with low basal metabolic rates, which indicate moderate to slow life histories. Our study therefore reveals ecological differences in domestication potential between plants and mammals. Domesticated plants belong to clades with traits that are advantageous in intensively managed high-resource habitats, whereas domesticated mammals are from clades adapted to moderately productive environments. Combining comparative phylogenetic methods with ecologically relevant traits has proven useful to unravel the causes and consequences of domestication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. RBG Kew. The State of the World’s Plants Report — 2016 (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, 2016).
    1. Zeven, A. C. & De Wet, J. M. J. Dictionary of Cultivated Plants and Their Regions of Diversity: Excluding Most Ornamentals, Forest Trees and Lower Plants (Pudoc, Wageningen, 1982); http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=XE8282385
    1. Dirzo, R. & Raven, P. H. Global state of biodiversity and loss. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 28, 137–167 (2003). - DOI
    1. Meyer, R. S. & Purugganan, M. D. Evolution of crop species: genetics of domestication and diversification. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 840–852 (2013). - DOI
    1. Zeder, M. A. in Biodiversity in Agriculture: Domestication, Evolution, and Sustainability (eds Gepts, P. et al.) 227–259 (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2012).

Publication types