Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Oct 12:13:1987-1997.
doi: 10.2147/CIA.S171739. eCollection 2018.

Screening mammography use in older women according to health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Screening mammography use in older women according to health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Joshua Demb et al. Clin Interv Aging. .

Abstract

Background: The extent to which screening mammography (SM) recommendations in older women incorporate life expectancy factors is not well established.

Objective: The objective of this review was to evaluate evidence on SM utilization in older women by life expectancy factors.

Data sources: We searched Medline, Embase and Web of Science from January 1991 to March 2016.

Study selection: We included studies examining SM utilization in women ages ≥65 years that measured life expectancy using comorbidity, functional limitations or health or prognostic status.

Data extraction and synthesis: ORs and 95% CIs were extracted and grouped by life expectancy category. Findings were aggregated into pooled ORs and 95% CIs and meta-analyzed by life expectancy category.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was SM utilization within the last 5 years. Life expectancy factors included number of comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, self-reported health status and 5-year prognostic indices.

Results: Of 2,606 potential titles, we identified 25 meeting the inclusion criteria (comorbidity: eight studies, functional status: 11 studies and health/prognostic status: 13 studies). Women with higher CCI scores had decreased SM utilization (pooled OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.67-0.85), but increased absolute number of comorbidities were weakly associated with increased SM utilization (pooled OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.00-1.36). Women with more functional limitations had lower SM use odds than women with no limitations (pooled OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.62-0.83). Screening utilization odds were lower among women with poor vs excellent health (pooled OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.96).

Conclusion: Greater CCI score, functional limitations and lower perceived health were associated with decreased SM use, whereas higher absolute number of comorbidities was associated with increased SM use. SM guidelines should consider these factors to improve assessments of potential benefits and harms in older women.

Keywords: comorbidity; functional limitations; health status; meta-analysis; screening mammography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart of studies included. Note: Copyright: © 2009 Moher et al. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed1000097.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of effect of comorbidity on SM utilization by study and measure type. Note: Weights are from random-effects analysis. Abbreviations: SM, screening mammography; ES, effect size; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of effect of functional limitations on SM utilization by study and measure type. Note: Weights are from random-effects analysis. Abbreviations: SM, screening mammography; ES, effect size; ADLs, activities of daily living; IADLs, instrumental activities of daily living.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of effect of health status and prognostic score on SM utilization by study and measure type. Note: Weights are from random-effects analysis. Abbreviations: SM, screening mammography; ES, effect size; SF-12, Short Form-12; PCS, physical component summary score; MCS, mental component summary score.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Hall HI, Logan P, Uhler RJ. Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998–1999. Cancer. 2002;94(11):2801–2812. - PubMed
    1. HealthCare.gov Preventive Health Services for Women. [Accessed April 9, 2015]. Available from: https://www.healthcare.gov/preventive-care-benefits/women/
    1. Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53(3):141–169. - PubMed
    1. Siu Al US. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(4):279–296. - PubMed
    1. Randolph WM, Goodwin JS, Mahnken JD, Freeman JL. Regular mammography use is associated with elimination of age-related disparities in size and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(10):783–790. - PubMed