Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 21;10(2):e215.
doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v10i2.8270. eCollection 2018.

Effective uses of social media in public health and medicine: a systematic review of systematic reviews

Dean Giustini  1 , Syed Mustafa Ali  2 , Matthew Fraser  3 , Maged N Kamel Boulos  3
Affiliations

Effective uses of social media in public health and medicine: a systematic review of systematic reviews

Dean Giustini et al. Online J Public Health Inform. .

Abstract

Introduction: Research examining the effective uses of social media (SM) in public health and medicine, especially in the form of systematic reviews (SRs), has grown considerably in the past decade. To our knowledge, no comprehensive synthesis of this literature has been conducted to date.

Aims and methods: To conduct a systematic review of systematic reviews of the benefits and harms ("effects") of SM tools and platforms (such as Twitter and Facebook) in public health and medicine. To perform a synthesis of this literature and create a 'living systematic review'.

Results: Forty-two (42) high-quality SRs were examined. Overall, evidence of SM's effectiveness in public health and medicine was judged to be minimal. However, qualitative benefits for patients are seen in improved psychosocial support and psychological functioning. Health professionals benefited from better peer-to-peer communication and lifelong learning. Harms on all groups include the impact of SM on mental health, privacy, confidentiality and information reliability.

Conclusions: A range of negatives and positives of SM in public health and medicine are seen in the SR literature but definitive conclusions cannot be made at this time. Clearly better research designs are needed to measure the effectiveness of social technologies. For ongoing updates, see the wiki "Effective uses of social media in health: a living systematic review of systematic reviews". http://hlwiki.slais.ubc.ca/index.php/Effective_uses_of_social_media_in_healthcare:_a_living_systematic_review_of_reviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Table VI. PRISMA flow diagram illustrating study selection
None
Conceptual Map
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kamel Boulos MN, Maramba I, Wheeler S. 2006. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med Educ. 6, 41. 10.1186/1472-6920-6-41 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giustini D. 2006. How Web 2.0 is changing medicine. BMJ. 333(7582), 1283-84. 10.1136/bmj.39062.555405.80 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kamel Boulos MN, Hetherington L, Wheeler S. 2007. Second Life: an overview of the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in medical and health education. Health Info Libr J. 24(4), 233-45. 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00733.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kamel Boulos MN. Networked social media in learning, teaching and research [SlideShare]. 30 May 2010. University of Plymouth, UK. Available from: https://www.slideshare.net/sl.medic/networked-social-media-in-learning-t...
    1. Fox S. Peer-to-peer healthcare: Many people - especially those living with chronic or rare diseases - use online connections to supplement professional medical advice. Washington, D.C: Pew Internet Research; 2011. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2011/Pew_P2PHea...