Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2018 Aug 28;6(10):1972-1977.
doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1753. eCollection 2018 Oct.

Metal allergy patient treated by titanium implant denture: A case report with at least 4-year follow-up

Affiliations
Case Reports

Metal allergy patient treated by titanium implant denture: A case report with at least 4-year follow-up

Huijiao Yan et al. Clin Case Rep. .

Abstract

Patch testing with metal reagents was positive on female patient with history of metal hypersensitivity after dental treatment. All of the dental restorations with metal components were removed, and subsequent oral rehabilitation utilizing dental implants and metal-free prostheses was carried out. The treatments alleviate the presenting signs and symptoms.

Keywords: case study; metal allergy; patch test; titanium implant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinical manifestation at the first dental appointment. A physical examination revealed red rashes on the palmoplantar surfaces of her hands (A) and feet (B). Intraoral examination findings were hyperemia of the oral mucosa (C‐E). There are some missing teeth
Figure 2
Figure 2
Clinical manifestation after the removal of dental prostheses. The all‐metal dental restorations were removed and replaced with composite restorations (A‐C)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Titanium metal insert to check the allergic reaction. The small piece of Ti was cemented to the distal aspect of the maxillary right canine and observed for 6 mo
Figure 4
Figure 4
Full mouth rehabilitation of patient using dental implants and metal‐free prostheses. The implant dentures were restored with provisional restorations. Patient reported improvement in her oral function after the completion of oral rehabilitation
Figure 5
Figure 5
Protocol for diagnosing and managing patient with dental metal allergy

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Raap U, Stiesch M, Kapp A. Contact allergy to dental materials. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012;10:391‐396. - PubMed
    1. Wataha JC, Lockwood PE, Khajotia SS, Turner R. Effect of pH on element release from dental casting alloys. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:691‐698. - PubMed
    1. Elshahawy W, Watanabe I, Koike M. Elemental ion release from four different fixed prosthodontic materials. Dent Mater. 2009;25:976‐998. - PubMed
    1. Bishara SE, Barrett RD, Selim MI. Biodegradation of orthodontic appliances. Part II. Changes in the blood level of nickel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103:115‐119. - PubMed
    1. Chen B, Xia G, Cao XM, et al. Urinary levels of nickel and chromium associated with dental restoration by nickel‐chromium based alloys. Int J Oral Sci. 2013;5:44‐48. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources